사이드바 영역으로 건너뛰기

Heterodox Economics in the US

View Comments

Hip Heterodoxy

Christopher Hayes

 

It's a Friday night in January, and I am searching for a free drink among 9,000 economists. Every year a sizable portion of the nation's economists descend on some lucky city for the Allied Social Science Associations Annual Meeting, the economics field's largest gathering, a kind of carnival of suits and supply curves.

Most academic disciplines have a similar annual convention, but no other can boast the same influence on American politics and policy--after all, Presidents don't appoint a council of anthropological advisers. It doesn't take long for mainstream academic thinking to become the foundation for the government's macroeconomic policy.

In 1968 Milton Friedman, then president of the American Economics Association (AEA), devoted his presidential address to arguing against Keynesian meddling in the economy and for a monetary policy focused on restraining inflation.

A decade later, his prescriptions would be largely adopted. In 2005 onetime Reagan adviser Martin Feldstein called for Social Security privatization just as Republicans in Washington were mobilizing (unsuccessfully) toward the same end.

For more reading, http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070611/hayes

진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크
2007/05/29 12:05 2007/05/29 12:05

댓글0 Comments (+add yours?)

Leave a Reply

트랙백0 Tracbacks (+view to the desc.)

Trackback Address :: http://blog.jinbo.net/thereds/trackback/134

Newer Entries Older Entries