이래도 한 세상, 저래도 한 세상

본문

아인슈타인과 문워킹을 / 

본문

by John Heaton

1. A. Kenny, Wittgenstein, Penguin, 1973

훌륭한 정통적 해설서

2. J. Schulte, Wittgenstein: An Introduction, NYU Press, 1992

현재까지의 입문서 중 가장 훌륭한 책에 속함.

3. H.O. Mounce, Wittgenstein's Tractatus: An Introduction, B. Blackwell, Oxford, 1981

논리철학논고를 공부하려는 자들은 이책으로 시작하라.

4. G.P. Baker and P.M.S. Hacker, Wittgenstein: An Analytic Commentary in Philosophical Investigations, B. Blackwell, Oxford.

2,000페이지에 달하는 철학적 탐구 연구서. 전문 연구자들에게 추천.

5. S. Cavell, The Claim of Reason, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979

그의 회의론, 윤리성 그리고 비극과의 관계를 깊이 다룬 책.

6. H. Staten, Wittgenstein and Derrida, , B. Blackwell, Oxford, 1979

비트겐슈타인과 해체와의 관계

7. G. Frongia and B. McGuinness, Wittgenstein: A Biblographical Guide, B. Blackwell, Oxford, 1990

1990년까지의 비트겐슈타인에 관한 모든 논문을 알려주는 귀중한 안내서.

본문

Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation

진리와 해석에 관한 탐구  / 도널드 데이비슨 지음 / 이윤일 옮김 / 나남 / 2011년 02월

본문

*는 발제, †는 선택 자료

Ⅰ. 과학적 설명

A. 연역·법칙적 모형

Hempel, C., Philosophy of Natural Science, Ch. 5.  

Hempel & Oppenhiem, “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”, in Brody & Grandy, pp.151-155 & 160-163.

* Scriven, M., “Explanation, Predictions, and Laws”, in Pitt (ed.), Theories of Explanation, pp.67-72.

* Hempel, C., Aspects of Scientific Explanation, pp.359-376.

B. 통계적 모형

Hempel, C., Aspects of Scientific Explanation, pp.381-383 & 394-403.

Salmon, W.(1971), “Statistical Explanation”, in W. Salmon (ed), Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, pp.29-87.

C. 화용적 모형

van Fraassen, B.(1980), The Scientific Image, pp.103-109, 111-157.

Achinstein, P.(1983), The Nature of Explanation, pp.157-164, 181-185.

* Kitcher, P. & Salmon, W.(1987), “Van Fraassen on Explanation”, Journal of Philosophy 84: 315-330.

D. 인과적 모형

Salmon W. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, pp.34-47, 135-147.

† Kitcher, P. (1989), “Explanatory Unification and Causal Structure”, in P. Kitcher & W. Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. ⅩⅢ, especially pp.459-475.

Salmon, W. (1994), “Causality without Counterfactuals”, Philosophy of Science 61: 297-312.

* Hitchcock, C. (1995), “Discussion Salmon on Explanatory Relevance”, Philosophy of Science 62: 304-320.

† Salmon, W. (1997), “Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques”, Philosophy of Science 64: 461-477.

E. 후속 논의

* Cartwright, N., (1980) “The Truth Doesn't Explain Much,” in Brody & Grandy, pp.184-189.

* Friedman, M. (1974), “Explanation & Scientific Understanding,” Journal of Philosophy 71: 5-19. Reprinted in Pitt, 188-198.

* Railton, P. (1978), “A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation,” Philosophy of Science 45: 206-226.

Ⅱ. 과학 이론

A. 논리경험주의

Hempel, C., Philosophy of Natural Science, Ch. 6.

Carnap, R., “Theories as Partially Interpreted Formal System”, in Brody & Grady, pp.5-12.

† Hempel, C.(1970), “On the ‘Standard Conception’ of Scientific Theories”, in Radner & Winokur (eds.)(1970), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. Ⅳ pp.142-163.

Suppe, F., The Structure of Scientific Theories, pp.16-36, 45-53.

B. 비판과 대안

Putnam, H., “What theories are not”, in Mathematics, Matter and Method, pp.215-220.

Achinstein, P., Concepts of Science, pp. 157-165 & 172-178.

* Suppe, F.(1972), “What’s wrong with the received view on the structure of scientific theories?”, Philosophy of Science 39, 1-19.

† Beatty, J.(1980), “What's wrong with the received view of evolutionary theory?”, in P. D. Asquith & R. Giere (eds.), PSA 1980, vol. 2, PSA, pp.397-426.

Giere, R., Explaning Science, Ch. 3, pp.62-91.

* Machamer, Darden, Craver (2000), “Thinking about Mechanisms”, Philosophy of Science 67: 1-25.

† Churchland, Paul (1989), “On the Nature of Theories: A Neurocomputational Perspective”, in Paul Churchland (1989), A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science, MIT, pp.153-196.  

Ⅲ. 과학적 방법

A. 선험적 방법과 귀납적 방법

Descartes, The Philosophy Works of Descartes (trans. J. Cottingham et al), pp.143-144 & 240-245.

Newton, I., Newton's Philosophy of Nature (ed. H. S. Thayer), pp.3-8.

Hempel, C.(1966), Philosophy of Natural Science, pp.10-18.

†McMulin, E.(1990), “Conceptions of Science in the Scientific Revolution”, in Lindberg & Westmen (eds), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, pp.27-92.

B. 가설·연역적 방법

Braithwaite, R., Scientific Explanation, pp.12-21.

Hempel, Philosophy of Natural Science, Chs.1-3.

Popper, K., Logic of Scientific Discovery, Ch. Ⅰ,Ⅱ, Ⅳ & Ⅴ.

Glymour, C.(1980), Theory and Evidence, Princeton Univ. Press, pp.29-48.

† Achinstein, “The Method of Hypothesis: What is it supposed to do, and can it do it?”, in Achinstein & Hannaway (eds.)(1985), Observation, Experiment, and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, MIT Press, pp.127-145.

* Achinstein, P.(2000), “Why Philosophical Theories of Evidence Are (and Ought To Be) Ignored”, Philosophy of Science 67, Supplement, pp.S180-S192.

C. 귀추적 방법

Hanson, N., “Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery?”, in Brody & Grandy, Reading in the Philosophy of Science (2nd ed), pp.398-408.

Suppe, P., The Structure of Scientific Theories, pp.151-166.

Harman, G., “The Inference to the Best Explanation”, in Brody & Grandy, pp.323-327.

*Curd, M., "The Logic of Discovery: An Analysis of Three Approaches", in Brody & Grandy, pp.417-427.

† Langley, P., et al(1987), Scientific Discovery, pp.44-62.

D. 역사적 접근

Kuhn, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chs. 2-4, 9, 10, 12 & Postscript.

* Kuhn, T., “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice”, in T. Kuhn (ed.)(1977), The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, pp.320-339. Reprinted in Curd & Cover (eds.)(1998), pp.102-118.

Lakatos, I., “Falsification and the methology of Scientific research programmes”, in Lakatos & Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp.91-159.

Feyerabend, P., Against Method, Intro.-Ch.5, Chs. 14, 15, 18.

Suppe, F., The Structure of Scientific Theories, pp.135-151, 170-180.

† E. 과학철학의 자연화

†Giere R., “Philosophy of Science Naturalized”, in Brody & Grandy, pp.379-397.

†Laudan, L., “Progress of Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism”, American Philosophical Quartely 24: 19-31.

본문

Hempel, C., Philosophy of Natural Science, 

자연 과학 철학 / C. G. 헴펠 지음 / 곽강제 옮김 / 서광사 / 2010년 06월  

Hempel, C., Aspects of Scientific Explanation,

과학적 설명의 여러 측면: 그리고 과학철학에 관한 다른 논문들 / 칼 구스타프 헴펠 지음 / 전영삼, 여영서, 이영의 옮김 / 나남 / 2011년 03월

Churchland, Paul(1989), A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science, MIT.

물질과 의식 : 현대심리철학입문??

Kuhn, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, .

과학혁명의 구조

Feyerabend, P., Against Method, Intro.

방법에의 도전

본문

블로그들

철학 관련

캐롤라인

진화심리학 관련

http://cafe.daum.net/Psychoanalyse

라데빵스 조도령

강유원

신기철 http://diebildung.net

ㅇㅈㅎ http://blog.naver.com/phil_19?Redirect=Log&logNo=80175830510

http://zolaist.org/tc/

http://zolaist.org/wiki/index.php/%EB%B6%84%EB%A5%98:%EA%B3%BC%ED%95%99%EC%B2%A0%ED%95%99

본문

콰인과 분석철학 / 로마노스 지음 / 지평문화사 (1995)

: 원제는 <Quine and Analytics>

콰인의 자연주의 인식론 / 김영남 지음 / 서광사 (1994)

: 김영남 박사의 박사학위 논문을 책으로 출판한 것