CINA

본문

Updated version (Tuesday afternoon):

The Nepali Election Commission, 4.22:
FPTP counting over, CPN(M) win 120 out of 240 seats

 
The counting for the votes under the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) has been completed today.

According to the final tally, the Communist Party of Nepal(Maoist) have won 120 out of the total 240 seats under FPTP. It has fallen one short of commanding clear majority under FPTP.

Nepali Congress (NC) is a distant second with 37 seats followed by the Unified Marxist Leninist (UML) with 33 seats. The Madhesi Janadhikar Forum (MJF) bagged 30 seats while Terai Madhes Loktantrik Party (TMLP) won 9 seats. Rajendra Mahato-led Sadbhavana Party has pocketed four seats. Two seats each have been won by Nepal Workers and Peasants Party (NWPP), Peoples Front and independent candidates. Rastriya Janamorcha won one seat.

The counting of votes under Proportional Representation (PR) category, too, is nearing completion.

☞ CPN(M) ‘officially’ claim to head new govt.. (eKantipur, 4.22)

Last Sat. (4.19) the Chinese/HK magazine Asia Times published following interesting, but also (in some parts very) controversial article:

A Maoist in Nepal's palace (*)

Early results and trends indicate that last Thursday's election will push Nepal from feudal monarchy to a "people's republic", without a democratic interlude in between.

The political party comprising former members of the Maoist insurgency (1996-2006) succeeded in garnering support sufficient to leave its democratic rivals far behind. The scoreboard on April 10 placed the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoists) on top with 119 of 240 seats in the first-past-post segment of the poll. The nearest rival, the Nepali Congress, was trailing with 34 seats while the moderate communist party, Unified Marxist-Leninist (UML), stood third with 31 seats.

Pre-poll estimates had put the Nepali Congress ahead of others, expected to be followed by the UML. The Maoists were expected to be reduced to an unenviable 50 seats. But all such predictions failed, to the pleasant surprise of Maoist leaders. On the contrary, their party looked set to win a majority of the 335 seats filled through proportional representation of the electoral system. The remaining 26 seats in the 601-strong Constituent Assembly are to be occupied by government nominees.

"We have achieved more than what we expected," Baburam Bhattarai, a senior Maoist leader, said in a newspaper interview published on Monday. Since his party was emerging as the leader among the three main contestants, it would be logical, he said, for them to head the next coalition government whose job is to assist the assembly to draw up a constitution that replaces the one promulgated in aftermath of first pro-democracy movement of 1990.

That statute transformed the active monarchy into a British-style constitutional monarchy which lasted until King Gyanendra staged a royal coup at the start of 2005. But Gyanendra's goal to return the monarch to the political stage alienated democratic forces, prompting many to join the Maoist campaign aimed at removing the monarchy for good. This process is to be completed in a few weeks time - at the first sitting of the newly-elected Constituent Assembly.

Bhattarai and several others in the present Maoist leadership drew inspiration from the Sendero Luminoso (Shining Path) movement in Peru. This correspondent remembers a time, in early 1990s, when Bhattarai collected the signatures of several parliament members to denounce Alberto Fujimori and demand for the release of Shining Path leader Gonzalo. While the insurgency in Peru failed, even after the loss of 69,000 lives, Maoists in Nepal take solace from the fact that their struggle has been successful, and with fewer deaths - officially just over 13,000.

Besides, the Maoist leaders claim that theirs has been a homegrown movement. This is a statement not substantiated by events and facts that surfaced in intervening years. Not all the arms and ammunition they used, for example, were from the police posts or army barracks their cadre stormed periodically. Similarly, some of their comrades who left the movement have made public the fact that their Supremo Prachanda and Bhattarai spent eight of the ten years in different locations in India, taking advantage of the unregulated, porous border between Nepal and India. Significantly, the signing of a 12-point agreement in 2005, between the alliance of seven parties and the Maoists' party, was held in New Delhi with tacit approval of Indian authorities.

But what is the secret of Maoist surprise success in the April 10 poll? What allowed them to thwart almost all the opinion polls, analyses and predictions?

First, it reflected the public's desire for a progressive change; it was the Maoists were ready and able to adapt. Second, the voters decided to punish the incumbent parties for their inability to provide basic security to the population, their inefficiency in performance and their indifference towards widespread corruption.

There may have been other, less encouraging reasons. Election watchers and analysts have recently reported firsthand reports of pre-poll irregularities and intimidation by Maoist cadre. Proxy voting was widespread, mainly on the Maoists' behalf; Nepalis working in Indian cities returned home in large numbers and cast votes impersonating those who had gone to work abroad. Another point repeatedly mentioned is the Maoist leaders' thundering pre-election speeches in which they threatened to resume the violent insurgency if they did not win the election. People who suffered during the previous insurrection may have voted for Maoists in order to prevent violence.

International election observers described the polling day as largely peaceful, but there was no way to monitor events in the interior or remote districts of Nepal.

Kathmandu-based Western diplomats and their Indian and Chinese counterparts could provide no credible reason why the Maoists made such surprising gains. On the contrary, it had been believed that the election would bring the Maoists down to their proper size - putting them in a position from which they could neither think of going back to the jungles for another phase of armed struggle nor command enough assembly seats to shake the foundation of a newly-installed government.

India's National Security Advisor M K Narayanan openly declared - through CNN/IBN - India's preference for the Nepali Congress to outdraw the other contesting parties. But other Indian political leaders blasted Narayanan's remarks as interference in a friendly country's internal affairs. In an editorial published on Monday, The Hindu, one of India's major newspapers, described New Delhi's assumption: "Official India, which erroneously worked on the assumption of Maoist defeat, also needs to accept the reality of Maoist ascendancy."

The poll's outcome is unlikely to be encouraging to anyone except the Chinese. But they, too, may have second thoughts once they review the Maoist position on issues such as autonomous regions and the right to self-determination. In Nepal, they have been advocating for autonomous regions based on ethnicity, often with the right to self-determination. This policy runs counter to China's current situation in Tibet.

The euphoria in the Maoist camp is palpable. Prachanda, who won from two constituencies, was already being projected as new Nepal's first president. If such a scheme is agreed on, he will evict "suspended" king Gyanendra and begin residing in Narayanhity Palace within weeks. (*)

Prachanda's deputy, Bhattarai, defeated his nearest rival by a wide margin of over 40,000 votes in the hilly district of Gorkha, the original homeland of the Gurkhas. He is likely to be the country next prime minister. If so, he will move to Baluwaataar, the official residence of prime minister where Girija Prasad Koirala currently resides.

Koirala is in a dilemma due to heavy electoral losses his Nepali Congress party incurred. His daughter, as well other members of the Koirala family, lost elections. Also there is mounting pressure from a party executive for Koirala to quit the premiership over his responsibility for the election debacle. Most of the Congress leaders are also of the view that any kind of association with the Maoists, especially in a coalition government, would invite further devastation for the party.

"Let the Maoist run their show and put their revolutionary agenda into action," said Laxman Ghimire, an executive member of the Congress party.

But Koirala's thirst for power is well known. The Maoists may make use of that weakness, as they have in the past, in order to smooth the path for a "progressive" government. Accordingly, the Maoist leaders may request that he continue to head the government (and remain as acting head of state) until the new constitution is drafted. Koirala's established credentials as a democrat could help the Maoists gain international acceptance and recognition.

The Maoists know they have formidable challenges ahead. For example, the touchy issue of evicting Gyanendra, the move to integrate Maoist forces into the national army and unpopular measure to deal with the soaring cost of petroleum products. They must also reassure the country's business community that no measures will be taken to discourage investment and that private properties will not be nationalized.

Prachanda has stated many times that the Maoists realize classical communism is not feasible in the 21st century. But others consider Maoist leaders to be master strategists who can employ a range of tactics to accomplish their mission. Had that not been the case, they could not have reached where they are today.

In 2005, they realized that their People's Liberation Army did not have the capability to defeat the then Royal Nepal Army, and reach power through military means. That is why they and entered into a political pact with disgruntled democratic forces under Koirala. Slowly and steadily, said a high-placed army officer, they achieved their objectives through Koirala who perhaps unwittingly yielded too much, ostensibly in his bid to salvage the peace process.

"Of course, the country needs peace, but at what price?" said the official.

Koirala's "cooperation" is crucial for the Maoists, and essential to consolidating their hold on power. Koirala may be carried away - once again - by their polite and promising words, and brush aside the Congress party's reservations against cooperating with the Maoists. In the end, Koirala runs the risk of being a modern-day Paul von Hindenburg, the second president of Germany's Weimer Republic. Hindenburg is remembered for having given the initial legitimacy to Adolf Hitler, and thereby his Nazi dictatorship, beginning in 1933. (**)

To some Nepalis, their situation in their country is not as alarming as it is made to appear. There is no need to be panicky, some are quick to say.

Apprehensions of external - Indian - military intervention are vastly exaggerated by those who prefer to gloss over the presence of a mighty China to the north. The red wave need not be read as an indicator of a major political disaster. The present scenario is no reason to be scared, despite the current phase of delicate transition.

"Will the Maoists be able to establish a totalitarian communist system in Nepal?" editor Prateek Pradhan of The Kathmandu Post asked in an article on April 17. He doesn't believe the Maoists have ability to change the country beyond recognition. Those who share Pradhan's view didn't lose any time mentioning the hordes of problems the Maoists will now be forced to confront. The regional identity issue raised by some Terai groups, for example, could become a formidable albatross for the Maoist government.

A counter argument, however, came a day earlier. Editor Mumaram Khanal of Dishabodh, a leftist publication in Nepalese, told a radio interviewer Wednesday: "[The] Maoists are a radical force; if they began to behave like one of the existing political parties they will soon cease to be a force to be reckoned with. They know what they are and what they stand for."

In other words, the Maoists won't stop their journey until they reached their destination.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/JD19Df03.html

* Well, I hope that the CPN(M) activists - likely the possibly next (democratic elected) "rulers" of Nepal - are so wise to turn the former palace of the king for a while into a museum and later into a huge culture/community center for everyone (of the former exploited oppressed class)!!!

** Bullshit! The present developments in Nepal are not comparably to Germany in the early 1930s! The CPN(M) isn't a NSDAP and Prachanda is definetely not A. Hitler!! Finally that's just a very primitive anti-communist propaganda (even it's a result of stupid ignorance)..

Related articles:

☞ No residue of Monarchy will be kept, says Maoist Chairman (eKantipur, 4.21)

☞ Kicking out a king (Guardian, 4.16)

☞ Nepal king urged to exit gracefully (al-Jazeera, 4.16)

And here the latest (insane!!!) proposal/demand by (parts of) the - hopefully former!! - ruling class: World Hindu Federation (WHF) on Sunday warned the constituent assembly not to endorse Nepal as secular state nor end monarchy without referendum. "CA should write 'Hindu' state in the new constitution," said President of the federation, Bharat Keshari Singh, organizing a press meet at WHF premises at Bansbari. "Otherwise, we won't be silent spectators, rather we will unveil our regular plans of agitation in our upcoming conference to re-establish Hindu State at any cost." (eKantipur, 4.21)