진보넷 첫화면으로 블로그홈 | 메일 | 공동체 로그인내정보
CINA
http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA

no chr.!
자본주의 박살내자!
>


2008년 07월 글 목록(총 26 개)
[2008년 07월 31일 23:17] '백골단' 부활
[2008년 07월 30일 23:28] 이길준 #2
[2008년 07월 29일 22:58] 이길준 #1
[2008년 07월 28일 23:24] [7.26/27] 투쟁밤 (^^)..
[2008년 07월 27일 23:48] 反미친(李)정부!!
[2008년 07월 25일 23:50] 제3회 이주노동자영화제
[2008년 07월 24일 22:36] '李정권 박살내자!'..
[2008년 07월 23일 23:25] 이스라엘 .. 꿈
[2008년 07월 22일 23:27] 버마: 反독재 투쟁
[2008년 07월 21일 20:56] 7.21-25: '촛불영화제'
[2008년 07월 20일 22:54] 미친 獨島'항의'
[2008년 07월 18일 22:33] 反G8/제노바2001년 #2
[2008년 07월 17일 22:17] 건설노조투쟁/국제 연대
[2008년 07월 16일 22:53] 내일(木) 투쟁일정
[2008년 07월 15일 23:03] 反G8/제노바2001년 #1
[2008년 07월 14일 23:07] 금강산../조선중앙통신
[2008년 07월 13일 22:46] '선군정치' 만세!
[2008년 07월 11일 23:23] 7.12 反(李)정부 투쟁
[2008년 07월 10일 22:29] 6.25 전쟁/대학살
[2008년 07월 09일 23:11] 대만(臺灣) 공산주의 금기
[2008년 07월 08일 22:32] [7.5] MTU 캠페인
[2008년 07월 07일 23:36] 反(李)정부 투쟁 #13
[2008년 07월 06일 22:39] 反(李)정부 투쟁 #12
[2008년 07월 04일 17:10] 촛불시위 반대집회^^
[2008년 07월 02일 22:57] 反'조중동'!!
[2008년 07월 01일 23:05] 내일(水): '총파업'
'백골단' 부활 추천

Special Riot Police Unit Established (K. Times, 7.30)
 

Police launched a special riot police squad to crack down on illegal protesters(*).

It will replace the current riot police beginning Thursday.


Civic groups denounced the move, saying the special police are reminiscent of

the "BaekGolDan (or White Skull Squad/백골단),'' a group of plain-clothes policemen wearing white helmets in the 1980s and 90s.



At that time, they brutally suppressed demonstrators who took to the streets to fight dictatorship.


The National Police Agency had an establishment ceremony for the team at a

police station in Sindang, Northeastern Seoul, Wednesday.


The special unit includes roughly 1,700 highly skilled police officers. They had to

complete a 6-month-long training session to join in the group, NPA said. NPA

plans to increase the number of special riot police to 14,000 by 2013.


The agency expects the special members will efficiently control protesters.


* i.e. (likely) almost all anti-gov't protests!

 


Demonstration of suppression (Hankyoreh, 7.31)

 


The riot police demonstrate how to suppress a demonstration at a ceremony for

establishing the riot police force held at their headquarters in the Sindang

neighborhood on July 30. Since February, 990 riot police officers have been

trained in demonstration suppression techniques. There were 240 riot police

officers present at the mock demonstration and all wore the standard suits of

armor.


Following the demonstration, Eo Cheong-soo, the chief of the National Police

Agency, said, “Riot police will arrest anyone who engages in illegal activity.” The

newly-trained force will begin their service in August.


On the same day, the People’s Countermeasure Council against Mad Cow

Disease held a press conference and announced that it was against the

establishment of the riot police force. At the press conference, Lee Jeong-hee, a

lawmaker with the minor opposition Democratic Labor Party said, “In 1991, a

university student died after being hit by the White Skull Squad (an organization

similar to the current riot police force). After that, our society reflected on the

excessive violence used by the police and abolished organizations like it from the

police force.”


Oh Chang-ik, the secretary general of Citizens’ Solidarity for Human Rights, said,

“I am afraid that the riot police have been trained to strike first against citizens.”



More articles about the issue:

Protesters to face special unit of new riot police (JoongAng Ilbo, 7.31)

‘백골단’ 1700여명 공식 부활.. (VoP, 7.30/incl. video)

“백골단 부활” 경찰관 기동대 창설 (NewsCham, 7.30) 

 

 

THE COPY: The new riot cop unit (aka the "New BaekGolDan") performed their "skills":


 

 


THE ORIGINAL: The "BaekGolDan" in real action (late 1980s):


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(2) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1575

이길준 #2 추천


Lee Gil-jun - A Riot Cop In Resistance #2


While the (reactionary) media of the S.K. ruling class is still lamenting about "protest violence", the "lack of respect for the law", "police impotence" (Chosun../JoongAng Ilbo) but also some Internet sources (such as OneFreeKorea), Kim Gil-jun, a young police officer, decided to refuse to continue his service in the riot police units (a part of the S.K. army!!), i.e. he refused his duty to oppress, if "necessary" with extreme violence, the daily mass protests (since late April) against the gov't. While refusing the service as riot cop, he decided to desert, sheltering himself in a cathedral and call publicly for the dismantling of the riot police units.


7.25: Press conference with Lee Gil-jun


The Internet magazine OhmyNews published y'day following impressing contribution (incl. interview) about Lee Gil-jun's case:


'I Left the Army to Save My Conscience'
Riot police officer takes a stand over candlelight vigils


'Putting Them Down, I Could Not Bear the Guilt'

 
Lee Gil-jun, a riot police officer, held a press conference on Friday, declaring his decision to leave the army. Lee made his decision during a leave of absence awarded for his hard work in suppressing the candlelight vigil protests. He made up his mind to no longer be a tool of suppression.


In the early dawn of June 1, protesters were still wide-awake with their candles in front of the presidential Blue House when the riot police rewarded them with water cannons and metal clubs.


Lee stood in the front line facing the protesters that day. He and the troops forced the people up to Guanghwamun. It was then that he realized what he was doing. From that moment, he could not bear the guilt.


He explained that his decision was not for some heroic reason but for his own conscience. He showed worries of all the pain and obstacles that lay ahead of him. The press conference was to be held on the day he had to rejoin the troop at 4 p.m. on July 25. Luckily, we were able to interview him the night before at 9 p.m.


The Riot Police Officer Who Longed to Join

the Candlelight Vigil


When were you assigned as a riot police? When you volunteered for it, weren't you aware of having to go out in riots?


"I was assigned as a riot police last February. I went to university for two years and decided to take three years off doing part time in press agencies and libraries, etc. … I was not an activist of any kind but I was rather interested in social problems [and] also had some critical views on the army and the military draft. Volunteering for a riot police was a compromising point for both. I think I was a bit too vague when I thought that there were other ways to serve as a riot police without having to use force. Looking back I have been too naive. [There are two kinds of police forces; one is a crime patrol police and the other one is a riot police. Lee was a crime patrol police officer with Seoul Joonglang Police Station and would patrol around the district maintaining public security. He would also be mobilized to government departments from time to time. However, things changed as he was sent to the candle vigil protests.]


"I heard the news about the candlelight vigil protests concerning the beef issues through a friend's letter early this May. You don't get all the news when you are inside so I was not aware of the details. Hence, it is true that I assumed the protest would cool down after awhile like other protests.


"So while I was out I participated in the candlelight vigils. I was astounded to see how furious the citizens were and how irresponsible the government could be towards this fatal issue. Then I had to return to the troop and stand against these people with no choice. For that moment I thought to myself that I was only standing guard. I guess it was only my own rationalization.


"A day after I returned the whole atmosphere changed. It was May 31. We were in standby on riot buses when an order was given to us to get out of the bus. Then [they] ordered us to run somewhere with our riot suits and shields. We ran until we stopped and we stood facing the protesters with me in the front line. I recall that it was university students in the front facing us and we were at Hyojadong that moment. Others alerted each other that things might become more serious and the whole situation was just too surreal for me. But as soon as I heard the water cannons were coming, I came to my senses. Are they serious? I thought. The water cannons actually waited for two hours for the protesters to strike first."


'Strike Them, But Don't Make It Obvious'


"'Wait for them to strike first? Isn't it a rather subjective judgment?' I asked. The higher officials told us, 'For us to win this strike was to wait for the people to strike first and have a clearer reason for us to fire the water cannons.


"'Strike them. But don't make it obvious. You might get caught by all the cameras so just hit them at the shin holding the shield up a little.'


"The suppression started as the water cannons were fired. Many people bled and fell to the ground of Guanghwamun as the sun came out.


"While firing the water, we were ordered to push forward. People at the back kept on pushing so I headed forward too. As we suppressed the people up to Guanghwamun, the sun came out and it was already morning. I slopped down on the ground dehumanized, wondering what I was doing. It is true that there were some people who were a bit violent. I was hit by a soju bottle too, but I was not angry though. It is because the protesters were unarmed while I was armed with a shield. For the citizens it must have been a scary sight.


"If we did not shout loud enough and be ferocious, we were told we would be strictly disciplined afterwards. Punishment in the police community is way more violent than any other punishments in the army.


"I was told, 'Having a dominant atmosphere is what makes a rival to the protesters. And we consider defeating them only as a part of our job.' A suppression route is made only to stop serious accidents but not to protect the people's safety is what I was also told. Therefore, the country has used the many young men solely as a tool for the sake of their own power and somehow allowed them to use a more violent force every time they faced the protesters."


From a Tool of Suppression to Acting Through One's Conscience


"After the protests were put down, I realized something as I heard our head's abusive language. I realized that something was wrong, that I wasn't thinking. We all gathered to block the vigils all throughout June and we worked overnight continuously. I could stand the physical exhaustion but I couldn't bear the meaninglessness of it all.


"I realized that there's no way to justify acting in such violence towards my fellow citizens. It was difficult to see demonstrators picket in front of my riot shield. It was so painful to hear people talking down at the police and tell us to disobey our orders. Sometimes I would cry, hidden behind my helmet.


"At first, I would try to just escape the situation. I tried to break my leg, thinking that if I were injured I wouldn't be in the frontlines. I tried to figure out if I could be moved to a different branch. But nothing worked out and the month of June was too long and difficult. Luckily, I wasn't in the lines that were in charge of breaking up the protests, but in regular street guarding posts. I couldn't bear it otherwise.


"As July passed I came to realize that I have to stand up rather than just try to escape. I've lived my whole life up to now, by compromising. But this one time, I wanted to stand up. I couldn't live with myself if I had to compromise my beliefs again this time. I finally felt this good type of "self-interest" to live with dignity and courage. The candlelight vigils showed how easy it was to manipulate these young men as tools of power. I couldn't support something like that anymore."


'In Order to Break the Circle of Violence, the Riot Police System

Must Be Discontinued'


OhmyNews asked Lee if he was worried about all the criticisms that he would face following the press conference. It is predictable that people would denounce him for his "supposed" cowardice and inability to adjust to army life.


"I want to tell as many people as possible. But I'm not speaking as some ideologically motivated advocate -- I just want to tell people my story. I want to tell them that there are people like myself in the riot police. And I wanted to speak out as a whistle blower and show how violently that riot police organization operates. And I wanted to object to the government for throwing young people into that mess and forcing them to clash against the demonstrators.


"I prepared for this press conference with the support of members of the People's Solidarity for the Abolition of Riot Police System. I'm not sure exactly what I'll say. Instead of some general overblown opinions, I just want people to know that there are people like me out there. And I hope through this process that others like myself who have been worrying by themselves will be able to come forward.


"One of the reasons I came forward is because of the culture of violence in the internal organization. But I probably wouldn't have come to this decision without the candlelight vigils. I probably would have found some way to adjust. And maybe I would have tried to be better out there on the frontlines."


Did the internal organization (of the riot police) become far more violent as the candlelight protests continued?


"The internal organization's atmosphere became progressively uglier after the candlelight vigils began. The pretext was to put the men on edge and maintain discipline. Before and after the protests, we would be harassed and beaten up. The physical abuse and human rights violations escalated as the candlelight vigils continued. I think I was beaten up every day in July."


Lee was extremely hesitant about this point. He did not want another person to be harmed because of his decision to come forward. Lee attributed his experiences to "structural problems." Lee said that the current riot police system must be abolished in order to break the circle of violence. But not everything can be attributed to "structural problems." Lee hoped that fellow riot police members would be able to choose to resist instead. He wished that his decision would give them courage to do so.


'I'm Most Worried About My Parents'


Lee was asked whether he had spoken with his parents about his decision. The worry was that his decision may lead to his arrest and that was something his parents may not understand or accept.


"I will try to speak with them either tonight or tomorrow morning. They probably will not understand at all. I don't think I'll be able to change their minds. I can accept whatever difficulty or suffering that happens because it was my choice, but when I think about the suffering my parents will experience because of me, I feel much sorrow and guilt."


After the press conference, Lee will begin a talk at the Korean National Christian Congress (KNCC) at Jongro. After 8 p.m., Lee will have surpassed his leave time and the army will come to take him back. Seeing how the police have arrested average citizens, it's no surprise what they will do to get a conscripted soldier who violated his leave time and conducted a press conference. The ones in power will go through Lee Gil-jun's records in order to find something that will make him out to be a "bad guy."


Shouldn't we embrace him? This young man who cried inside his helmet wishing he could stand together with the candlelight demonstrators. This young man who said, "I don't know what to say to my parents. I know that I will go to prison, but what can I do for my parents?" This young man who has so much criticism and punishment right before his eyes.


http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=383266&rel_no=1

 

 

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(2) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1574

이길준 #1 추천


Lee Gil-jun - A Riot Cop In Resistance #1


While the (reactionary) media of the S.K. ruling class is still lamenting about "protest violence", the "lack of respect for the law", "police impotence" (Chosun Ilbo/JoongAng IlboLee Gil-jun, a young police officer, decided to refuse to continue his service in the riot police units, i.e. he refused his duty to oppress, if "necessary" with extreme violence, the daily mass protests (since late April) against the gov't. While refusing the service as riot cop, he decided to desert, sheltering himself in a cathedral and call publicly for the dismantling of the riot police units.


Today's (bourgeois) Korea Herald wrote following article about Kim Gil-jun's case:


Officer wants compulsory police system abolished


A riot policeman is protesting the duty of dealing with street demonstrators against U.S. beef imports, calling for the compulsory service police system to be abolished.


"When standing with shields in front of citizens and using violence, I dare not think of refusing the order, and had no choice but to accept the pains without resistance," said Lee Gil-joon, 24, in a press conference on Sunday.


"I felt like my humanity was burning. It was a horrific thing to accept myself as having to toe the line without a word when being mobilized in the dispersal operations and standing to the side indefinitely, on the receiving end of public catcalls and complaints."


Lee's protest came after another officer demanded in mid-June that a national administrative appeals commission deliberate on his request for transfer to the Army, citing skepticism about performing his duty against his will.


Lee, who joined the Seoul police unit in February, has staged the protest since Sunday at a cathedral in Yangcheon-gu, southwestern Seoul. He initially planned to hold a press conference on Friday last week when he was set to return to his unit after his three-day vacation, but it was deferred to Sunday due to the stern admonishment of his parents.


"During the difficult times, I tried to find a way to escape, but thought that avoiding the situation is not the right answer," Lee said.


"By staying there, I thought I would end up eventually contributing to the maintaining of the oppressive structure. Most of all, I felt the need to listen to the voice of my heart and protest what suppresses me now with a clear voice in leading my remaining life."


Lee also said that assault and battery have occurred within the police unit, and called for a solution to stamp out the root causes of these problems.


Lee is likely to face charges for avoiding his duty. His supporters say that when he is tried they will assert that the auxiliary police system is unconstitutional. In 1991, a riot policeman filed a petition with the Constitutional Court to rule on a similar case, but five out of the nine judges at the court said that the police system is constitutional in their 1995 ruling.


All able-bodied Korean men of 19 or older are obliged to serve in the military for 24-27 months. Some apply for or are randomly selected for the National Auxiliary Police system instead of going into the military...

 


More about it you can read here tomorrow!

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1572

[7.26/27] 투쟁밤 (^^).. 추천

Well, I know... Last weekend's anti-gov't protest night (7.26/27) wasn't a very special/exciting event (compared to other "ordinary" protests in S.K.!), although 15,000 activists (during the entire night some 1500 activists were confronted with 11,000 riot cops..) gathered in downtown Seoul, according to today's bourgeois Korea Herald. 


But there are also - surprise, surprise!! - some voices who must make a fuss about it!


Like Scott B. (aka "King Baeksu"), an US American, who's residing since several years in Seoul. On Sunday he published his following "experience" about the protest night, incl. a proposal how YOU CAN SUPPORT the S.K. ruling class - i.e. the gov't and its instrument of oppression, the riot cops!(*):


Another Saturday Night in Chongno


So here's what the "peaceful" anti-2MB protesters did to the evil "violent" police and other "reactionary" elements on Saturday night, July 26th:


1. At around 8pm, about 1,000 protesters had occupied the main intersection at Chonggak so that no cars could go through.
After a while, the police opened the street (Chongno) by marching in a forward straight line, but with restraint and without hitting anyone that I could see. For some reason, after about 30 minutes the police decided to retreat, and one large line of police started retreating towards Ch'onggyech'on. Thus, they had left the entire intersection of Chonggak open again to the protesters, without arresting anyone or anything.


As the police were retreating, many protesters started charging at them and actually hitting them with their fists. There was the usual media frenzy, of course, flashes everywhere and whatnot. The most hilarious part was that the protesters were actually shrieking "Violent police!" as they were hitting the police! I thought this was just absurdly ironic and nothing else until I saw that one slight young policeman had been knocked unconscious by the protesters and had to be carried to the sidewalk and laid down. He was out for a while and eventually regained consciousness (volunteer protest medics and other police were attending to him), but couldn't stand up, so after waiting about 15 minutes an ambulance finally came and took him away.


Of course, none of the usual suspects were there to document all this, like Hankyoreh, MBC or KBS. I asked several protesters why they were complaining about the violent police when they were hitting police first, and they all whined, "The police started it!" like third graders. Remember: THE POLICE WERE RETREATING when this poor young guy was KNOCKED UNCONSCIOUS!


2. At about 10pm, the police had prepared to go through the same routine again and open up Chonggak to traffic. They had much larger forces this time and again opened up the intersection without using clubs or the water cannon, just fire extinguishers a couple of times as far as I could see. I was standing in front of Boshingak when I noticed that a riot policeman had been pulled off the line and was being dragged towards Boshingak by a screaming group of protesters. Some yebigun (reservists) and other protesters were trying to protect him, but several other protesters were rushing forward and getting in cheap shots, despite the fact that the policeman had lost his helmet and had his arms pinned to his sides.


I was so pissed off after having seen that earlier policeman knocked unconscious that when one chubby young college student in wire-rimmed glasses, a white polo shirt and white surgical face mask rushed up and tried to hit the captured policeman in the head -- and from behind no less -- I immediately grabbed one of his backpack straps and yanked him away before the blow could land. He was quite light and I pulled him several feet from the scrum, but made sure not to actually hit him myself.


When he turned around and looked at me, the expression on his face was priceless. He had prepared this "I'm a poor victim, what are you doing to me?!" look that instantly morphed into utter confusion and bewilderment, since a foreigner was standing there glaring at him and he had nothing to say in defense since he had just been trying to hit a defenseless young kid himself.
I was even more disgusted by this little coward when I saw how easily he backed away from me in fear and confusion.


So here again we have another "peaceful" protester trying to attack the "violent" police, and you can almost guess what cliche he whined at me before slithering back into the crowd: "The police started the violence!"


Right!


3. At about midnight the police had kept the Chonggak intersection open successfully for a while and there were just a couple hundred protesters milling about the plaza in front of Boshingak yelling "Violent police!" and whatnot as usual. There were some funny scenes: One young kid was screaming at the police for like 5 minutes so loudly that I thought he had gone insane, and kept pretending to run up and attack the police before stopping at the last second. The police did nothing, of course, despite this clear provocation. After a while I saw him sitting down on a rock nearly hyperventilating, and of course a half dozen volunteer medics rushed over and treated him like some poor victim that had just been brutally assaulted by the police, asking him repeatedly, "Are you OK? Are you OK?" and taking his temperature and so on.


Another tall guy was holding a white handkerchief to the top of his head and being interviewed by two young female reporters. They got his name and number and his story about how he had apparently been hit by the police or some such. I noticed that there was no blood and his eyes looked very sharp and he was certainly in good shape by all appearances, but the reporters scribbled down his testimony in their notebooks with breathless concern and effusive empathy. After the guy left, I went up to them and after confirming that they were journalists, I asked them, "If a protester lies to you, how can you know that? How do you confirm what you're told by them?" They looked totally confused and after a beat or two they replied lamely, "Well, we ask other people for their stories, too." I certainly hadn't seen them trying to look for witnesses for the story of the guy they had just interviewed.


Suddenly, there was a big commotion by the metal fence in front of Boshingak. A big chubby ajosshi in a white dress shirt and wire-rimmed glasses was surrounded by several dozen screaming protesters. They were claiming that he had "attacked" some poor haraboji, who was nowhere to be found. There was a lot of screaming and yelling at the guy, who was slightly drunk and had two other friends trying to protect him, one in his thirties and another in his fifties, also in white dress shirts;
apparently they had just been out for a night on the town in Chongno-2-ga. The chubby ajosshi kept saying, "Just go away!" but the protesters wouldn't, so he calmly pulled out his cellphone, called the police and said very evenly in a low voice, "I'm in a bit of a dangerous situation here..." As soon as he said that, the protesters went mental and one guy in a pink shirt rushed up and smacked the ajosshi in the head, breaking his glasses which flew to the ground. Two other guys in red-bandana face
masks were standing behind the fence and also got in two cheap shots to the back of the ajosshi's head. Fortunately, another one of the protesters blocked the ajosshi and begged for calm. The first guy who had hit the ajosshi was dragged away by other protesters, practically screaming bloody murder at the ajosshi. A second later, some other young kid also tried to hit the ajosshi, landing an indirect blow to his chest, but eventually the violence was contained and there was a long discussion about how the ajosshi needed to "apologize to the haraboji."


So they found the haraboji and the ajosshi got on his knees and begged for forgiveness. The haraboji seemed cool and they quickly made up, but all the other protesters were standing in a circle around them talking about how the ajosshi had "beat up this poor haraboji for no reason" and taking endless pictures and videos of this "terrible" man. After a few minutes, the three guys were allowed to leave since the haraboji seemed placated and the ajosshi seemed genuinely contrite.


I followed them until a safe distance and then got the real story from the three guys (at least, it seemed legit to me). The ajosshi told me, "I used to be a policeman, and that haraboji was standing in front of the police yelling and trying to hit them.
I was upset because I used to be a policeman, so I went up and tried to separate the haraboji from the police by putting my arms between them. That's all! Suddenly, the protesters rushed up and claimed that I had 'beaten' that haraboji, but that's just not true." He concluded, "Those people are crazy! I even lost my glasses!" and then they quickly walked away.


So was he spinning the situation in his favor, had he really "hit" the haraboji? Well, the guy seemed pretty chilled out to me and had been very calm when he tried to call the police. And would a guilty person have even called the police in the first place?

Then on the other side, there are the protesters who hit the police themselves even as they are screaming, "Violent police!"
Hmmm... whom to believe? A difficult decision! All I know is that I saw four different protesters hit that ajosshi several times and he did not even raise a first once in retaliation. Didn't seem very "violent" to me, and he was quite a big guy, so I can only say that my gut tells me that he was telling the truth.


Of course, you can be sure that Agora and probably Hankyoreh will have lots of propaganda to milk about how some disgusting ajosshi had tried to "beat up" a helpless haraboji who was only trying to "fight the dictatorship" and "defend democracy," and who had been heroically defended by the righteous protesters. Hell, he'll probably get a medal of some sort. And, of course,
you can be sure that there will be no mention of the fact that four different people hit the ajosshi in the face and on the head and even broke his glasses.


4. As the ajosshi was on his knees apologizing to the haraboji, another ajosshi in a pink polo shirt came up to me and shouted angrily in perfect English as he wagged his index finger at me, "Do you want to be the next victim?!" Perhaps he had seen me yank away the earlier protester. I replied calmly in Korean, "Why don't you try demonstrating peacefully?" and of course he had
nothing to say to that. Another protester quickly stood between us and said, "I'm sorry!" to me, but actually I would have loved it if the ajosshi tried to attack me because then someone might actually believe me when I say what I have been saying all along: The protesters have started all the violence during these 80-odd demonstrations, and have been intentionally trying to provoke the police from the get-go. The police, in return, have been so restrained that it is really inexplicable at times. I actually asked several policemen tonight, "Aren't you angry that one of your buddies was knocked out unconscious?" and they said, "Of course we are!" So I asked them why they were being so soft on the protesters despite such abuse and they only said, "Our orders come from the top."


* I have sent four emails to Amnesty International detailing exactly the kinds of incidents that I have described here, since their recent report on "police abuse of human rights" during these demonstrations was clearly biased and was obviously manipulated by the protesters to their own advantage. Amnesty International, however, has ignored me so far, because apparently they are
unconcerned with the truth. Perhaps they have given it an amnesty for now?

If you are as offended by their unconscionable attitude as I am, feel free to copy the eye-witness report I have written here and send it to AI in triplicate:

http://www.amnesty.org/en/contact


These dead-enders have clearly gone off the deep-end, knocking police unconscious, attacking ordinary citizens and making violent threats to local residents like me simply because I do not agree with them.


When will this madness ever end?


http://www.kingbaeksu.com/board.htm

 

 

Of course also the S.K. reactionary newspapers have an "opinion" about last weekend's protest (^^):

Protests turn into violence (JoongAng Ilbo, 7.28)

Street Protests Descend Into Lawlessness (Chosun Ilbo, 7.28)

Chronic Lack of Respect for the Law (Chosun Ilbo, 7.29)

Hard-core ralliers hit a new low in protest violence (JoongAng..)

Police impotence (..Ilbo, 7.29)

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1571

反미친(李)정부!! 추천


First of all: the S.K. state since last Friday increased its pressure on the wanted anti-gov't/labour union activists, hiding in Jogye-sa (the main Buddhist temple in downtown Seoul) and in the KCTU HQ. Now there are almost 1000 riot cops hanging around at the two sites to get an opportunity to arrest the wanted activists.

민주노총 사수투쟁…경찰검거압박 (KCTU)

 

Riot cops are blocking Jogye-sa

KCTU HQ: Cops are searching for the wanted activists


In another development the S.K. ruling class/gov't increased its terror against labour(KCTU) activists: Last Friday and Saturday striking Allianz and KOSCOM workers were attacked by riot cops and/or criminal gangs, hired by the capitalists (aka the "employers").

Allianz생명 용역폭력 '조합원들 중상' (KCTU)


7.25: Riot cops are attacking striking KSCOM workers


In this situation it was clear, that - the for Saturday night planned - anti-gov't rally/demo (the 80th!!) will be no picnic (especially after many of potential demonstraters were confronted already in the afternoon with blockades and attacks by thousands of riot cops)!

 


Well, finally in today's morning hours (surprise, surprise!) the situation in downtown Seoul - more than 1500 activists (the entire evening/night around 15,000 protesters took the streets, according to K. Herald) occupiyed since several hours Jong-no, the main avenue there - escalted (but in reality only a little bit!!!):


 

 

 

 

According to Korea Herald 42 protesters were arrested: 

 

 

 


Related reports:
"미친교육 미친소 2MB 심판의 날" (VoP)

촛불은 쉽게 꺼지지 않았다.. (OhmyNews)
새벽 3시 20분 살수하면서 시위대 진압 (NewsCham)
"시위진압의 ABC도 모르냐?" (Tong-il News)






 

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1570

제3회 이주노동자영화제 추천

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1569

'李정권 박살내자!'.. 추천

Arrest Warrants for KCTU Leaders  (K. Herald, 7.24)
 

Police (today) sought arrest warrants for three top officials of the nation's biggest labor group on charges of orchestrating illegal demonstrations and strikes against U.S. beef imports, and obstructing work last year at branches of a local retailer.


The officials are Lee Suk-haeng, president of the Korea Confederation of Trade Unions, the nation's second-largest umbrella labor group; Senior Vice President Jin Young-ok; and Secretary-General Lee Yong-sik.


"We will combine all cases of lawsuits and complaints against KCTU members regarding the illegal protests in our investigation. Upon the issuance of the writs, we will set up an investigative team dedicated to the matter," a police official told reporters.


They are alleged to have directed KCTU members to go on strike, calling for the renegotiation of the U.S. beef import deal. They are also accused of instructing members illegally demonstrate in front of warehouses in Gyeonggi Province to block the transit of U.S. beef. The beef had been frozen since Oct. 5, when banned backbone fragments were found.


The allegations include that they led unauthorized gatherings against U.S. beef imports, and illegal occupations of public roads during the protests.


Police accuse them of leading or encouraging KCTU members to join the sit-in protests last year at stores of local retail giant E.Land's Homever and New Core stores, located in Sangam-dong and Jamwon-dong in Seoul.


Calling on management to retract a large-scale dismissal of temporary contract workers in July last year, unionized employees participated in illegal sit-ins for about a month.


The labor group roundly berated the government as "quashing democracy by misusing its law enforcement power."


"The Lee Myung-bak dictatorial regime which betrayed the people is trampling democracy by abusing its power after it lost the confidence of the public," the KCTU said in a statement.


"The action (seeking arrest warrants) is an unjust oppression on the rightful exercise of workers' rights to protect public health, and an absolutely political one. We will take it as oppression against our 800,000 members, and collectively and strongly react to it."


A lawmaker of the Democratic Labor Party also railed against the government, calling for the resignation of the National Police Agency Chief Eo Cheong-soo.


"Before seeking arrest warrants, it is more urgent for the government to sack the police chief who ignored the public and led the violent dispersal operations," said Rep. Hong Hee-deok in a statement.

 

7.24 afternoon: Units of the riot cops in front of KCTU's HQ in Seoul-Yeongdeungpo

7.24 late evening, near the KCTU HQ: Riot cops ready to arrest the KCTU leaders..

..but until now some hundred supporters are trying to protect them!


Meanwhile the Korea Times reported today that.. "Police plan to award those who contributed to quelling anti-U.S. beef protesters. A total of 385 police officers including riot police will receive awards, said the National Police Agency.." That's real JUSTICE & DEMOCRATIC PROGRESS (aka "liberal democracy", as K. Herald labeled it today in another article) - Made in Korea!!(^^)


Related reports:

경찰, 민주노총 침탈 움직임 '비상' (KCTU)

이석행 민주노총 위원장 등 체포영장 발부 (VoP)

이석행 "촛불 소녀가 왔다는 소식에 목메어" (OhmyNews)

 

Update (7.25):


KCTU Threatens to Go on Strike (K. Times)
 

Members of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) threatened to go on strike, Friday, demanding the government suspend the imports of U.S. beef and abandon its moves to "suppress the union.''


The threat came one day after a court issued an arrest warrant for the union's head and two other leaders. They are under suspicion of organizing illegal strikes calling for the end of U.S. beef imports.


Meanwhile, police said they were in no hurry to arrest them.


"We have no plan to go into the headquarters of the union and arrest them,'' a police officer said. "But if they come out, we will definitely arrest them.''


7.25 in front of KCTU HQ. Cops are searching for the union leaders..


BTW.. so there are now two sites in Seoul where anti-gov't activists have to hide because of arrest warrants: 6 activists are hiding Jogye-sa, Seoul's main Buddhist temple in downtown, and the 3 labour union leaders in KCTU's HQ.

 
Related:

조계사.민주노총 동시 강제연행 들어가나 (VoP)

민주노총 사수투쟁…경찰전진배치 (KCTU)




 

 

 

 

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1568

이스라엘 .. 꿈 추천

ISRAEL'S WET DREAMS


Today, exactly one week ago, the "prisoner exchange" between Israel and Hizbullah took place.
While Hizbullah claimed it THE MAIN VICTORY for the organization in the last 20 years (*), in Israel - only few hours after the exchange took place - a flood of really extreme strange articles/opinions were published in the (bourgeois) press.
Following you can "enjoy" just one of them, published last Thursday in the daily newspaper
Yedioth Ahronoth (**):


Day of infamy


‘Civilized’ is euphemism for weak, helpless; terrorists deserve death penalty


I was a new oleh (Jewish immigrant to Israel) when the PFLP and two Germans hijacked a plane full of Israelis to Entebbe. I remember well those nail-biting days, the moral dilemma of freeing dangerous terrorists for live hostages; the idea that negotiations would just lead to more hijackings. But what other choice did we have? After all, they were in Uganda, so far away.


We found a way.


I will never forget the morning of July 4, 1976, waking up to the news. Our soldiers had gone in, at great personal risk. They had saved almost everyone, and killed the terrorists. We were not helpless victims anymore, the Jews. No, we were clever, and resourceful and courageous. We showed the world how to behave.


We led the way.


I woke up the morning of July 16, 2008 with quite another feeling. Our soldiers, kidnapped on our own land, not across any international border, are brought back to us in caskets after two years of sadistic playfulness with the hearts of their families by Hizbullah terrorists, who led us to believe they were alive. And in exchange for dead bodies, we turn over a despicable baby-killer, Samir Kuntar (***).


Oh, you will hear the boosters of the Israeli government sigh. What can we do? We are civilized and they are not. We care about our soldiers and their families.


No, I’m afraid you do not. If you cared, then you would have a death penalty for people like Kuntar, so that they too can be released in caskets. And if you cared, you would be intelligent enough, seeing our soldiers brought back to us dead, to have put a bullet through Kuntar and then turned him over to his friends.


Civilized is a euphemism for weak and helpless. Civilized is not a moral value, because we all know what Western civilization is capable of. Concentration camps. Civilian round-ups, the gassing of children. All this under the banner of laws and policemen and governments. On the other hand, the moral thing to do to a tried and convicted murderer like Kuntar is to spill his blood, because he has spilled the blood of others. That may not fit in with current civilized niceties, but let no one say it is immoral.
 

Ashamed to be Israeli today


When it comes to immoral, to release Kuntar to a hero’s welcome and the opportunity to murder others is on the top of the scale.
 

My government, the Israeli government, arranged this. They let it happen. They oversaw it and implemented it. I am deeply ashamed to be an Israeli today. And I’m not very proud of being a Jew either, if this is how a Jewish country behaves. To lead the world in ever more despicable acts of appeasement is nothing to be proud of. The torch we always carried, the “light unto the nations” has been blown out by the hot-air of our politicians.


If we cared about our soldiers, we would not be showing our enemies that kidnapping and terrorism pay. We would not be setting the stage for the next murderous terrorist raid and hostage standoff. We would be passing laws with a mandatory death penalty for convicted terrorists with blood on their hands, as well as their accomplices. We would be making these laws retroactive.


Then, we would be cutting off all water and electricity to Gaza until Gilad Shalit is released. If that didn’t work, we’d begin executions within one week, increasing the number convicted terrorists facing firing squads with each passing day until Gilad is returned to us safe and sound. And if that didn’t work, we would begin daily bombings of Gaza, with the same number and frequency of attacks that our own city Sderot has suffered over the past three years from the Gazans. Not civilized? Perhaps. But moral. Extremely moral.


My fantasy is that Israelis will rise up and overturn the political system which has left them with the dregs of their nation as leaders - a bunch of self-serving crooks and sycophants who will do anything to stay in office; an electoral system in which a party like Kadima, with its collection of felons and moral imbeciles, who got only 23% of the vote, is allowed to rule us into the ground. We have Mr. Olmert, and Ms. Livni, and Mr. Peres, and Mr. Ramon (a convicted sex offender, who is now in line to take over from Olmert) and many, many others to thank, for creating this day of infamy.
 

May G-d redeem us from them.


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3569608,00.html

 


* But there are also others in Lebanon who are not really convinced of Hizbullah's so-called "victory"! Referring to the 2nd Lebanon War (Summer 2006) triggered by the abduction of two IDF soldiers (with the only aim to get "bargain chips" for a prisoner exchange with Israel!), a Lebanese Web site pointed out the following "net losses":
- 1200 civilians dead - 400 of them under 13
- 4400 civilians injured - 700 permanently
- one million displaced from their homes
- 125,000 housing units destroyed or damaged
- 80% of some southern villages destroyed
- 38,850,951 sq.m. contaminated by cluster bombs
- 188 wounded by cluster bombs - 67 of them children
- 20 killed by left-over cluster bombs - five of them children
- $5 billion in economic damages
- $15b. in long-term costs to the economy
- $64 million cleanup of 12,000 tons of oil
- 91 bridges destroyed..


** incl. about 90 (mostly mad) comments by readers! Check it out here!!


*** S. Kuntar's "very special" salute (well, I think that everyone knows the real f... meaning of the notoriously salute..) after his release from Israel, during the "Rally of Victory" in Beirut (7.17), organized by Hizbullah:



Related articles (based on interviews with S. Kuntar):

'The girl screamed. I don't remember anything else' (Guardian, 7.19)

Allah Willing, I Will Kill More Israelis (documented by MEMRI)


트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1567

버마: 反독재 투쟁 추천


Last Friday the Guardian (UK) published following article about some (possible) new developments in Burma's movement against the dictarorship. While the report is - of course - interesting, in my opinion it's also somehow very concerning, if not even alarming (Why? I'll explain soon!): 


Burmese Opposition Ready to Escalate pro-Democracy Fight


Members of Burma's battered and disparate opposition are growing disillusioned with the old methods of the pro-democracy movement and are seeking ways to escalate their armed struggle.


"There is a very real debate among us about how to begin a more sustained armed struggle," an organiser of last September's failed uprising told the Guardian. "We are ready for that kind of action, if we can get the supplies and training that we need."


Speaking from exile in Thailand, Soe Aung, the chief spokesman for the National Council of the Union of Burma (NCUB), an umbrella group representing nearly all facets of Burma's disparate opposition, said he was witnessing a significant shift in the public attitude across Burma.


"After the September uprising and then the terrible cyclone response, the anger is surging. Some are considering violent means … the Burmese people are not that kind of people, there has been a real change."


Soe Aung spoke openly of how covert Western support, primarily from the US state department-funded National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and its subsidiary the International Republican Institute (IRI), had been fundamental to the success of the uprising.


"The US is certainly doing the most for the opposition. There has been real success in training and forming an underground movement through religious organisations and monastic organisations. These provide the best cover inside Burma. The monks can spread their training very effectively."


The NED describes itself as a private organisation but was created by, and remains accountable to, the US Congress. Set up under the Reagan administration in 1983, it has since played a leading role in influencing civil society and electoral processes in countries around the world unfriendly to US interests.


According to Brian Joseph, the man in charge of the group's Burma project, the NED gave $3m (£1.5m) to Burma in 2007. "We would send more, but there is a limit to what you can do in Burma," said Joseph.


Opposition activists both inside and outside Burma largely describe the improvements in political awareness and spread of information as a result of NED-funded projects, but also attribute them to the introduction of the internet to Burma in 2003.


"We could see in September how the advances were utilised. It wasn't just the monks but a massive increase of awareness among Burmese of all types. This was thanks largely due to media organs, the Democratic Voice of Burma, satellite TV, and, of course, the internet," said Soe Aung.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/18/burma

 


Here the final, more detailed version of the article, published in the Guardian, 7.19:

Seeds of further uprising amid the fear and intimidation


트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1566

7.21-25: '촛불영화제' 추천



Related article:

촛불, ‘공공성 지키기’로 본격 확대 (VoP, 7.21)

공공성 지키기 촛불주간, 촛불영화제 (참세상)


트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1565

미친 獨島'항의' 추천

Since last week "demonstrations swept through Korea in response to the Japanese government's decision to claim Dokdo islets (also claimed by South Korea) as part of its territory in its history textbooks" (OhmyNews, 7.18).


While LeeMB called to "all Koreans" to stay in "strong unity against Japan's illegal claim", almost all Koreans (*), involved in any kind of politics, "civil rights", labour activities etc.. followed the demand of the Dear Leader(^^):


"The Dokdo demonstrations brought together Koreans from all ideological stripes and colours. Progressives, conservatives, young and old came together to protest against Japan's actions." (OhmyNews)

 


While last Wednesday (7.16) protesters, here KCTU/KTU 'activists' (!!), "only"

hurled eggs and tomatoes (WHY not bloody American BSE beef???)

at the Japanese embassy in Seoul..

 


..one day later "protesters in Seoul staged a bloody demonstration

outside the Japanese embassy, slaughtering live pheasants – Japan's

national bird (**) – on the street", according to al-Jazeera (7.18)



They cut the heads off live pheasants, Japan’s national bird, and dripped the

blood on Japanese flags and on pictures of Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda and

former Japanese leaders. Some battered birds to death with hammers. Others cut

open bellies and ate the livers, shouting: “Dokdo is our territory!”,

The Standard (HK) reported on the same day.


* Of course not ALL Koreans: A minority of voices called for restraint in this debate. An OhmyNews contributor suggested that Dokdo become an "Island of Korean-Japanese Peace" and have the two countries manage the island and its seas together. According to OhmyNews this article - surprise, surprise!(^^) - incited mostly negative comments among the readers.


** An internet reader from Japan later mentioned following:
There is unintended irony here: The Korean nationalists are killing Common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus),and it’s name in Japan is Kourai-kiji (コウライキジ) meaning “Korean Pheasant”.
The natonal bird of Japan is Green Pheasant (Phasianidae versicolor), a subspecies of Common pheasant only seen in Japan. (^^)

 


About a very queer development Korea Herald reported last week (7.18):


Educators protest Japan Dokdo claim

  
Educators are stepping up their efforts to repudiate Japan's latest claim to the Dokdo islets.
The (conservative) Korea Federation of Teachers' Associations sent out letters to 394 teachers' associations in 171 countries, explaining why Japan's sovereignty claim over Dokdo is historically invalid.


"Dokdo has been recognized as a part of Korea historically and by international law, as well. Dokdo is clearly Korean territory, and its people are currently living there," the letter from the association representing over 190,000 teachers reads.


"Among a number of historical documents which prove that Dokdo is a territory of Korea, 'Samguksagi (the Chronicles of Three Kingdoms)' states that, in 512, Shilla, an ancient kingdom of Korea, was comprised of Usanguk, which was a country based on Usan Island (the name of Dokdo at the time)."


The KFTA letter also discussed other evidence, such as the "The complete map of the Joseon Kingdom," which was drawn by the French geographer Danville in 1737; "The map of three adjoining countries," by a Japanese scholar named Hayashi Shihei in 1785, and "The attached map for elementary school geography textbooks," published by the Japanese Government General of Korea in 1934, which was during the Japanese colonial period.


"Besides, it turned out that the imperial Japanese Council of State (Dajokan) confirmed in 1877 that Uleungdo and Dokdo had no connection with Japanese territory," reads the letter signed by KFTA president Lee Won-hee.


"Above all, the KFTA is deeply worried that the Japanese government has tried to take advantage of the invalid assertion of some Japanese, and has written a book for teachers which promotes a distorted history."


The KFTA said that, "as the issue of Dokdo is related to the education and the views about history which the next generation will develop, rather than disputes between two countries, teachers and the organizations responsible for students' education should take the lead in straightening out the matter."


While seeking support from educators around the world, Korean teachers also pledged to thoroughly educate their students about Dokdo to raise their historical awareness. Japan's right-wing textbook publishers and local administrators have continued to make sovereignty claims over Dokdo, based on its seizure of the islands in 1910 when it invaded Korea. (Korea was under Japanese colonial rule from then until liberation in 1945.)


The ("progressive") Korean Teachers and Education Workers' Union (a part of the KCTU), with nearly 80,000 members, joined forces with the KFTA to hold special classes on Dokdo as soon as school starts next month. Summer vacation starts in most Korean middle and high schools next week.


"Teachers have begun preparing the educational material for the courses on Dokdo," the KFTA said.


Superintendents of 16 provincial or municipal administrations across the country have also agreed to enhance the education regarding Dokdo.


"Japan's irrational behavior - teaching fabricated history to the new generation - is intended to cover up its historical errors such as war, violence, oppression and exploitation," said the group of superintendents.


"This will threaten Korea-Japan relations, the peace of Northeast Asia and the world."


The KFTA sent out newsletters to its 190,000 members in 11,000 schools nationwide, asking them to participate in the educational campaign. The teachers are asked to give students assignments to check out photographs, historical records and media reports about Dokdo over the summer vacation.


The KFTA is considering issuing a joint statement with the North Korean teachers' association to denounce Japan's recent claim...



Related stuff:

Progressives, Conservatives Unite Over Dokdo (Korea Times, 7.16)


And finally - of course - the madness is continuing (!!):

Seoul May Take Hardline Steps on East Sea Islets (K. Times, 7.20)



 

 

 

 

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1564

反G8/제노바2001년 #2 추천

Two days ago it was reported that the 15 guilty, sentenced two days before (I wrote about it 7.15), of the 2001-G8 brutality will not go to jail (*). Well, that's not a surprise, not really! But y'day the British newspaper Guardian published following very impressing/horrifying report about...


The Bloody Battle of Genoa


When 200,000 anti-globalisation protesters converged on the Italian city hosting the G8 summit in 2001, all but a handful came to demonstrate peacefully. Instead, many were beaten to a pulp by seemingly out-of-control riot police. But was there something more sinister at play? And will the victims ever see proper justice?


Riot cops surround a seriously injured anti-globalisation protester lying

on a pavement in central Genoa


It was just before midnight when the first police officer hit Mark Covell, swiping his truncheon down on his left shoulder. Covell did his best to yell out in Italian that he was a journalist but, within seconds, he was surrounded by riot-squad officers thrashing him with their sticks. For a while, he managed to stay on his feet but then a baton blow to the knee sent him crashing to the pavement.


Lying on his face in the dark, bruised and scared, he was aware of police all around him, massing to attack the Diaz Pertini school building where 93 young demonstrators were bedding down on the floor for the night. Covell's best hope was that they would break through the chain around the front gates without paying him any more attention. If that happened, he could get up and limp across the street to the safety of the Indymedia centre, where he had spent the past three days filing reports on the G8 summit and on its violent policing.


It was at that moment that a police officer sauntered over to him and kicked him in the chest with such force that the entire lefthand side of his rib cage caved in, breaking half-a-dozen ribs whose splintered ends then shredded the membrane of his left lung. Covell, who is 5ft 8in and weighs less than eight stone, was lifted off the pavement and sent flying into the street. He heard the policeman laugh. The thought formed in Covell's mind: "I'm not going to make it."


The riot squad were still struggling with the gate, so a group of officers occupied the time by strolling over to use Covell as a football. This bout of kicking broke his left hand and damaged his spine. From somewhere behind him, Covell heard an officer shout that this was enough - "Basta! Basta!" - and he felt his body being dragged back on to the pavement.


Now, an armoured police van broke through the school gates and 150 police officers, most wearing crash helmets and carrying truncheons and shields, poured into the defenceless building. Two officers stopped to deal with Covell: one cracked him round the head with his baton; the other kicked him several times in the mouth, knocking out a dozen teeth. Covell passed out.


There are several good reasons why we should not forget what happened to Covell, then aged 33, that night in Genoa. The first is that he was only the beginning. By midnight on July 21 2001, those police officers were swarming through all four floors of the Diaz Pertini building, dispensing their special kind of discipline to its occupants, reducing the makeshift dormitories to what one officer later described as "a Mexican butcher's shop". They and their colleagues then illegally incarcerated their victims in a detention centre, which became a place of dark terror.


The second is that, seven years later, Covell and his fellow victims are still waiting for justice. On Monday, 15 police, prison guards and prison medics finally were convicted for their part in the violence - although it emerged yesterday that none of them would actually serve prison terms. In Italy, defendants don't go to jail until they have exhausted the appeals process; and in this case, the convictions and sentences will be wiped out by a statute of limitations next year. Meanwhile, the politicians who were responsible for the police, prison guards and prison medics have never had to explain themselves. Fundamental questions about why this happened remain unanswered - and they hint at the third and most important reason for remembering Genoa. This is not simply the story of law officers running riot, but of something uglier and more worrying beneath the surface.


The fact that this story can be told at all is testament to seven years of hard work, led by a dedicated and courageous public prosecutor, Emilio Zucca. Helped by Covell as well as his own staff, Zucca has gathered hundreds of witness statements and analysed 5,000 hours of video as well as thousands of photographs. Pieced together, they tell an irrefutable tale, which began to unfold as Covell lay bleeding on the ground.


The police poured into the Diaz Pertini school. Some of them were shouting "Black Bloc! We're going to kill you," but if they genuinely believed they were confronting the notorious Black Bloc of anarchists who had caused violent mayhem in parts of the city during demonstrations earlier in the day, they were mistaken. The school had been provided by the Genoa city council as a base for demonstrators who had nothing to do with the anarchists: they had even posted guards to make sure that none of them came in.


One of the first to see the riot squad bursting in was Michael Gieser, a 35-year-old Belgian economist, who subsequently described how he had just changed into his pyjamas and was queuing for the bathroom with his toothbrush in his hand when the raid began. Gieser believes in the power of dialogue and, at first, he walked towards them saying, "We need to talk." He saw the padded jackets, the riot clubs, the helmets and the bandanas concealing the policemen's faces, changed his mind and ran up the stairs to escape.


Others were slower. They were still in their sleeping bags. A group of 10 Spanish friends in the middle of the hall woke up to find themselves being battered with truncheons. They raised their hands in surrender. More officers piled in to beat their heads, cutting and bruising and breaking limbs, including the arm of a 65-year-old woman. At the side of the room, several young people were sitting at computers, sending emails home. One of them was Melanie Jonasch, a 28-year-old archaeology student from Berlin, who had volunteered to help out in the building and had not even been on a demonstration.


She still cannot remember what happened. But numerous other witnesses have described how officers set upon her, beating her head so hard with their sticks that she rapidly lost consciousness. When she fell to the ground, officers circled her, beating and kicking her limp body, banging her head against a near-by cupboard, leaving her finally in a pool of blood. Katherina Ottoway, who saw this happen, recalled: "She was trembling all over. Her eyes were open but upturned. I thought she was dying, that she could not survive this."


None of those who stayed on the ground floor escaped injury. As Zucca later put it in his prosecution report: "In the space of a few minutes, all the occupants on the ground floor had been reduced to complete helplessness, the groans of the wounded mingling with the sound of calls for an ambulance." In their fear, some victims lost control of their bowels. Then the officers of the law moved up the stairs. In the first-floor corridor they found a small group, including Gieser, still clutching his toothbrush: "Someone suggested lying down, to show there was no resistance. So I did. The police arrived and began beating us, one by one. I protected my head with my hands. I thought, 'I must survive.' People were shouting, 'Please stop.' I said the same thing ... It made me think of a pork butchery. We were being treated like animals, like pigs."


Officers broke down doors to the rooms leading off the corridors. In one, they found Dan McQuillan and Norman Blair, who had flown in from Stansted to show their support for, as McQuillan put it, "a free and equal society with people living in harmony with each other". The two Englishmen and their friend from New Zealand, Sam Buchanan, had heard the police attack on the ground floor and had tried to hide their bags and themselves under some tables in the corner of the dark room. A dozen officers broke in, caught them in a spotlight and, even as McQuillan stood up with his hands raised saying, "Take it easy, take it easy," they battered them into submission, inflicting numerous cuts and bruises and breaking McQuillan's wrist. Norman Blair recalled: "I could feel the venom and hatred from them."


Gieser was out in the corridor: "The scene around me was covered in blood, everywhere. A policeman shouted 'Basta!'. This word was like a window of hope. I understood it meant 'enough'. And yet they didn't stop. They continued with pleasure. In the end, they did stop, but it was like taking a toy away from a child, against their will."


By now, there were police officers on all four floors of the building, kicking and battering. Several victims describe a sort of system to the violence, with each officer beating each person he came across, then moving on to the next victim while his colleague moved up to continue beating the first. It seemed important that everybody must be hurt. Nicola Doherty, 26, a care worker from London, later described how her partner, Richard Moth, lay across her to protect her: "I could just hear blow after blow on his body. The police were also leaning over Rich so they could hit the parts of my body which were exposed." She tried to cover her head with her arm: they broke her wrist.


In one corridor, they ordered a group of young men and women to kneel, the easier to batter them around the head and shoulders. This was where Daniel Albrecht, a 21-year-old cello student from Berlin, had his head beaten so badly that he needed surgery to stop bleeding in his brain. Around the building, officers flipped their batons around, gripping the far end and using the right-angled handle as a hammer.


And in among this relentless violence, there were moments when the police preferred humiliation: the officer who stood spread-legged in front of a kneeling and injured woman, grabbed his groin and thrust it into her face before turning to do the same to Daniel Albrecht kneeling beside her; the officer who paused amid the beatings and took a knife to cut off hair from his victims, including Nicola Doherty; the constant shouting of insults; the officer who asked a group if they were OK and who reacted to the one who said "No" by handing out an extra beating.


A few escaped, at least for a while. Karl Boro made it up on to the roof but then made the mistake of coming back into the building, where he was treated to heavy bruising to his arms and legs, a fractured skull, and bleeding in his chest cavity. Jaraslaw Engel, from Poland, managed to use builders' scaffolding to get out of the school, but he was caught in the street by some police drivers who smashed him over the head, laid him on the ground and stood over him smoking while his blood ran out across the Tarmac.


Two of the last to be caught were a pair of German students, Lena Zuhlke, 24, and her partner Niels Martensen. They had hidden in a cleaners' cupboard on the top floor. They heard the police approaching, drumming their batons against the walls of the stairs. The cupboard door came open, Martensen was dragged out and beaten by a dozen officers standing in a semicircle around him. Zuhlke ran across the corridor and hid in the loo. Police officers saw her and followed her and dragged her out by her dreadlocks.


In the corridor, they set about her like dogs on a rabbit. She was beaten around the head then kicked from all sides on the floor, where she felt her rib cage collapsing. She was hauled up against the wall where one officer kneed her in the groin while others carried on lashing her with their batons. She slid down the wall and they hit her more on the ground: "They seemed to be enjoying themselves and, when I cried out in pain, it seemed to give them even more pleasure."


Police officers found a fire extinguisher and squirted its foam into Martensen's wounds. His partner was dragged by her hair and tossed down the stairs head-first. Eventually, they dragged Zuhlke into the ground-floor hall, where they had gathered dozens of prisoners from all over the building in a mess of blood and excrement. They threw her on top of two other people. They were not moving, and Zuhlke drowsily asked them if they were alive. They did not reply, and she lay there on her back, unable to move her right arm, unable to stop her left arm and her legs twitching, blood seeping out of her head wounds. A group of police officers walked by, and each one lifted the bandana which concealed his identity, leaned down and spat on her face.


Why would law officers behave with such contempt for the law? The simple answer may be the one which was soon being chanted outside the school building by sympathetic demonstrators who chose a word which they knew the police would understand: "Bastardi! Bastardi!" But something else was happening here - something that emerged more clearly over the next few days.


Covell and dozens of other victims of the raid were taken to the San Martino hospital, where police officers walked up and down the corridors, slapping their clubs into the palms of their hands, ordering the injured not to move around or look out of the window, keeping handcuffs on many of them and then, often with injuries still untended, shipping them across the city to join scores of others, from the Diaz school and from the street demonstrations, detained at the detention centre in the city's Bolzaneto district.


The signs of something uglier here were apparent first in superficial ways. Some officers had traditional fascist songs as ringtones on their mobile phones and talked enthusiastically about Mussolini and Pinochet. Repeatedly, they ordered prisoners to say "Viva il duce." Sometimes, they used threats to force them to sing fascist songs: "Un, due, tre. Viva Pinochet!"


The 222 people who were held at Bolzaneto were treated to a regime later described by public prosecutors as torture. On arrival, they were marked with felt-tip crosses on each cheek, and many were forced to walk between two parallel lines of officers who kicked and beat them. Most were herded into large cells, holding up to 30 people. Here, they were forced to stand for long periods, facing the wall with their hands up high and their legs spread. Those who failed to hold the position were shouted at, slapped and beaten. Mohammed Tabach has an artificial leg and, unable to hold the stress position, collapsed and was rewarded with two bursts of pepper spray in his face and, later, a particularly savage beating. Norman Blair later recalled standing like this and a guard asking him "Who is your government?" "The person before me had answered 'Polizei', so I said the same. I was afraid of being beaten."


Stefan Bauer dared to answer back: when a German-speaking guard asked where he was from, he said he was from the European Union and he had the right to go where he wanted. He was hauled out, beaten, given a face full of pepper spray, stripped naked and put under a cold shower. His clothes were taken away and he was returned to the freezing cell wearing only a flimsy hospital gown.


Shivering on the cold marble floors of the cells, the detainees were given few or no blankets, kept awake by guards, given little or no food and denied their statutory right to make phone calls and see a lawyer. They could hear crying and screaming from other cells.


Men and women with dreadlocks had their hair roughly cut off to the scalp. Marco Bistacchia was taken to an office, stripped naked, made to get down on all fours and told to bark like a dog and to shout "Viva la polizia Italiana!" He was sobbing too much to obey. An unnamed officer told the Italian newspaper La Repubblica that he had seen brother officers urinating on prisoners and beating them for refusing to sing Faccetta Nera, a Mussolini-era fascist song.


Ester Percivati, a young Turkish woman, recalled guards calling her a whore as she was marched to the toilet, where a woman officer forced her head down into the bowl and a male jeered "Nice arse! Would you like a truncheon up it?" Several women reported threats of rape, anal and vaginal.


Even the infirmary was dangerous. Richard Moth, covered in cuts and bruises after lying on top of his partner, was given stitches in his head and legs without anaesthetic - "an extremely painful and disturbing experience. I had to be held down." Prison medical staff were among those convicted of abuse on Monday.


All agree that this was not an attempt to get the detainees to talk, simply an exercise in creating fear. And it worked. In statements, prisoners later described their feeling of helplessness, of being cut off from the rest of the world in a place where there was no law and no rules. Indeed, the police forced their captives to sign statements, waiving all their legal rights. One man, David Larroquelle, testified that he refused and had three of his ribs broken. Percivati also refused and her face was slammed into the office wall, breaking her glasses and making her nose bleed.


The outside world was treated to some severely distorted accounts of all this. Lying in San Martino hospital the day after his beating, Covell came round to find his shoulder being shaken by a woman who, he understood, was from the British embassy. It was only when the man with her started taking photographs that he realised she was a reporter, from the Daily Mail. Its front page the next day ran an entirely false report describing him as having helped mastermind the riots. (Four long years later, the Mail eventually apologised and paid Covell damages for invasion of privacy.)


While his citizens were being beaten and tormented in illegal detention, spokesmen for the then prime minister, Tony Blair, declared: "The Italian police had a difficult job to do. The prime minister believes that they did that job."


The Italian police themselves fed the media with a rich diet of falsehood. Even as the bloody bodies were being carried out of the Diaz Pertini building on stretchers, police were telling reporters that the ambulances lined up in the street were nothing to do with the raid, and/or that the very obviously fresh injuries were old, and that the building had been full of violent extremists who had attacked officers.


The next day, senior officers held a press conference at which they announced that everybody in the building would be charged with aggressive resistance to arrest and conspiracy to cause destruction. In the event, the Italian courts dismissed every single attempted charge against every single person. That included Covell. Police attempts to charge him with a string of very serious offences were described by the public prosecutor, Enrico Zucca, as "grotesque".


At the same press conference, police displayed an array of what they described as weaponry. This included crowbars, hammers and nails which they themselves had taken from a builder's store next to the school; aluminium rucksack frames, which they presented as offensive weapons; 17 cameras; 13 pairs of swimming goggles; 10 pen-knives; and a bottle of sun-tan lotion. They also displayed two Molotov cocktails which, Zucca later concluded, had been found by police earlier in the day in another part of the city and planted in the Diaz Pertini building as the raid ended.


This public dishonesty was part of a wider effort to cover up what had happened. On the night of the raid, a force of 59 police entered the building opposite the Diaz Pertini, where Covell and others had been running their Indymedia centre and where, crucially, a group of lawyers had been based, gathering evidence about police attacks on the earlier demonstrations. Officers went into the lawyers' room, threatened the occupants, smashed their computers and seized hard drives. They also removed anything containing photographs or video tape.


With the courts refusing to charge the detainees, the police secured an order to deport all of them from the country, banning them from returning for five years. Thus, the witnesses were removed from the scene. Like the attempted charges, all the deportation orders were subsequently dismissed as illegal by the courts.


Zucca then fought his way through years of denial and obfuscation. In his formal report, he recorded that all the senior officers involved were denying playing any part: "Not a single official has confessed to holding a substantial command role in any aspects of the operation." One senior officer who was videoed at the scene explained that he was off duty and had just turned up to make sure his men were not being injured. Police statements were themselves changeable and contradictory, and were overwhelmingly contradicted by the evidence of victims and numerous videos: "Not a single one of the 150 officers reportedly present has provided precise information regarding an individual episode."


Without Zucca, without the robust stance of the Italian courts, without Covell's intensive work assembling video records of the Diaz raid, the police might well have evaded responsibility and secured false charges and prison sentences against scores of their victims. Apart from the Bolzaneto trial which finished on Monday, 28 other officers, some very senior, are on trial for their part in the Diaz raid. And yet, justice has been compromised.


No Italian politician has been brought to book, in spite of the strong suggestion that the police acted as though somebody had promised them impunity. One minister visited Bolzaneto while the detainees were being mistreated and apparently saw nothing or, at least, saw nothing he thought he should stop. Another, Gianfranco Fini, former national secretary of the neo-fascist MSI party and the then deputy prime minister, was - according to media reports at the time - in police headquarters. He has never been required to explain what orders he gave.


Most of the several hundred law officers involved in Diaz and Bolzaneto have escaped without any discipline or criminal charge. None has been suspended; some have been promoted. None of the officers who were tried over Bolzaneto has been charged with torture - Italian law does not recognise the offence. Some senior officers who were originally going to be charged over the Diaz raid escaped trial because Zucca was simply unable to prove that a chain of command existed. Even now, the trial of the 28 officers who have been charged is in jeopardy because the prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, is pushing through legislation to delay all trials dealing with events that occurred before June 2002. Nobody has been charged with the violence inflicted on Covell. And as one of the victims' lawyers, Massimo Pastore, put it: "Nobody wants to listen to what this story has to say."


That is about fascism. There are plenty of rumours that the police and carabinieri and prison staff belonged to fascist groups, but no evidence to support that. Pastore argues that that misses the bigger point: "It is not just a matter of a few drunken fascists. This is mass behaviour by the police. No one said 'No.' This is a culture of fascism." At its heart, this involved what Zucca described in his report as "a situation in which every rule of law appears to have been suspended."


Fifty-two days after the attack on the Diaz school, 19 men used planes full of passengers as flying bombs and shifted the bedrock of assumptions on which western democracies had based their business. Since then, politicians who would never describe themselves as fascists have allowed the mass tapping of telephones and monitoring of emails, detention without trial, systematic torture, the calibrated drowning of detainees, unlimited house arrest and the targeted killing of suspects, while the procedure of extradition has been replaced by "extraordinary rendition". This isn't fascism with jack-booted dictators with foam on their lips. It's the pragmatism of nicely turned-out politicians. But the result looks very similar. Genoa tells us that when the state feels threatened, the rule of law can be suspended. Anywhere.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/17/italy.g8


* Genoa riots: 15 guilty of G8 brutality will not go to jail



Somehow(^^) related:

 

 

 

 

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1563

건설노조투쟁/국제 연대 추천

 

Already last week (7.08) BWI initiated an on-line Solidarity Campaign for S. Korea:


Support the Branch of the Pohang Construction Plant Workers Union!


Take two minutes to sign our solidarity campaign to support the Branch of the Pohang Construction Plant Workers Union, KFCITU in South Korea.


POSCO, a major steel production company in the country, launched a systematic campaign to break the union since the strike in 2006 by forcing union members to quit if they want to work and limiting access of union officials entering sites to address members issues. Members are still in jail.


We cannot tolerate that POSCO has used its political and economic clout in Pohang, where the company controls at least 70% of the economy to implement a deliberate and strategic plan to break the union through various tactics.


We call upon you to participate and forward this message to your fellow union members and co-workers. It is very important that you involve people in your union, in your workplace, who haven't yet had the satisfaction of sending off a message...


The full text of the Soli Campaign you can (MUST!!) read and sign here:
http://www.bwint.org/default.asp?Index=1788&Language=EN

 


Related/background:

Korea: Anti-union repression continues (ITUC, 7.17)

KFCITU Member Killed by Riot Cops


트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1562

내일(木) 투쟁일정 추천

 

BTW.. it would be very pleasant to hear on tomorrow's anti-gov't protests NOTHING about the f.. Dok-do issue, because there are (likely^^) many more important disgraces to protest/fight against! For example the massive exploitation of millions of "irregular" workers, the situation of migrant workers (i.e. the ongoing crackdown and the oppression of MTU!), the f... education system, the idiotic N"S"L, the presence of USFK, but also the nationalism in parts of the "progressive" movement etc. etc...

 






트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1561

反G8/제노바2001년 #1 추천

It's now almost 7 years ago that the Italian gov't tryed to supress the/all protests against the 2001-G8 summit in Genoa with a wave of massive state terror. "Death and terror in Genoa" - like that observers described the time in July 2001 there.


The Italian anarchist C. Guliani, killed 2001.7.20 by the police during a demonstration


Yesterday, after years of delay, a few state servants who realized the policy of state terror by committing crimes against the human/civil rights of hundreds of protesters, were sentenced.., as the Guardian (UK) reported today:


Rape threats, beatings and racist chants: 15 Italians jailed for abuse of G8 Genoa protesters


Fifteen Italian police officers and doctors were last night sentenced to jail terms of up to five years after being found guilty of abusing protesters detained during riots at the 2001 G8 summit in Genoa.


Thirty other defendants were cleared of charges ranging from assault to the denial of basic human rights. The judges issued their verdicts after 11 hours of closed-doors deliberations.


The sentences totalled less than a third of what had been demanded by the prosecution. But they will nevertheless be embarrassing for Silvio Berlusconi and his rightwing allies, in office in Italy both then and now.


The court heard former detainees including Britons testify that they were insulted, beaten and sprayed with asphyxiating gas. Some were threatened with rape.


Detainees were made to join in chants in praise of Italy's late fascist dictator, Benito Mussolini. Another chant, lauding Chile's Augusto Pinochet, ended: "Death to the Jews."


Between 100,000 and 200,000 demonstrators converged on Genoa seven years ago to take part in anti-globalisation protests. Most were peaceable, but some were not, and the situation deteriorated as the police employed tactics that many witnesses described as heavy-handed.


The violence peaked with the death of a 23-year-old Italian demonstrator, shot dead by a conscript Carabiniere. More than 250 of those arrested were taken to a holding camp that had been created at Bolzaneto, six miles from Genoa, where the abuses took place.


The heaviest sentence, five years, was given to the camp commander, Antonio Biagio Gugliotta. Twelve other police officers, eight men and four women, received jail terms of five to 28 months.


The chief of medical services at Bolzaneto, Giacomo Toccafondi, was given one year and two months in jail; he was accused of insulting detainees and failing to inform authorities after they were sprayed with asphyxiating gas in cells.


The detainees at Bolzaneto included about 40 who were arrested in a raid on a school being used as a dormitory. A judge ruled that there was no evidence to show any of those demonstrators had been involved in the violence in Genoa.


One, a Briton, Richard Moth, later told the Guardian that, despite injuries sustained in the raid that had him "screaming with pain", he was made to stand for hours spread-eagled against a wall.


The Bolzaneto trial was one of three arising from the Genoa G8 summit. In December 2007, 24 demonstrators were found guilty of damage to property and looting. They were given sentences ranging from five months to 11 years. In the third, ongoing trial, 28 defendants, including some of Italy's most senior police officers, face charges related to the raid on the school, which left 62 injured, three in comas.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/15/italy.g8

 


An expression of another opinion.. led to a "special treatment" by the Italian riot cops! 

 
Related reports/articles (July 2001):

The Horrific Torture of Genoa Protesters

Death and Terror in Genoa

Fascism in Genoa

The Raid on Diaz school


Documentary movie (sorry, it's only in German):

Gipfelstuermer - The Bloody Days of Genoa




 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1560

금강산../조선중앙통신 추천

N.K.'s "news"agency KCNA today ("only" three days after the deadly "incident" took place!!) published the first official statement (*).


But while the main parts of the statement are already internationally well-known (especially the obscure demand that "The south side should be held responsible for the incident, make clear apology to the north side.."^^), the text reports also about a typical miracle "Made in D.P.R.K."! While almost everyone knows that the victim, Park Wang-ja, was a middle-aged housewife from Seoul, her death in the "Paradise of the Korean Nation" changed surprisingly her gender!


But possibly it's just the result of the mad ideas of KCNA's editors and/or the Dear Leader's "ingenious wisdom"! Because: likely (??) they're just thinking that the murder of a male person is more tolerably/less disgusting for the int'l public..


* South Side Chiefly to Blame for Incident at Mt. Kumgang Resort


A south Korean who came to tour Mt. Kumgang was shot to death by a serviceman of the Korean People's Army at around 4:50 a.m. on July 11. A spokesman for the Guidance Bureau for Comprehensive Development of Scenic Spots issued a statement on Saturday in this regard.

 
The DPRK feels regretful at this, the statement notes, and goes on:
As for the cause of the incident, it occurred because the south Korean tourist trespassed on the area under the military control of the north side, going beyond the tourist zone.


A particular mention should be made of the fact that the south Korean tourist intruded deep into the area under the military control of the north side all alone at dawn, going beyond the clearly marked boundary fence, even his shoes got wet.

 
When a KPA serviceman spotted him and ordered him to stop, he did not obey the order but began to run away. He kept running although the KPA serviceman repeatedly shouted at him to stop, even firing blank bullets. The KPA serviceman could not but open fire at him.
 

The responsibility for the incident entirely rests with the south side.
 

The south side should be held responsible for the incident, make clear apology to the north side and take measures against the recurrence of the similar incident.

 
Nevertheless, the south side authorities unilaterally announced that they would suspend the tour of Mt. Kumgang for the time being, a challenge to the north side.


As it is an intolerable insult to the north side, it will take a measure not to accept south Korean tourists until the south side makes proper apology for the recent incident and takes measures against the recurrence of such incident.


As the cause of the incident is very clear and the north side has already confirmed the scene of the incident together with personnel of the Hyundai side right after its occurrence, it cannot accept the south side's proposal for inspecting the area of the north side for investigation.


http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2008/200807/news07/14.htm#1




트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1559

'선군정치' 만세! 추천

A NEW VICTORY FOR THE MILITARY FIRST POLICY!!


In the morning of July 11 in the Kumgang Mountain "tourist area" the armed forces of Korea, the Korean People's Army (KPA), prevented an massive attack against the D.P.R.K., the paradise of the entire Korean nation!


At 04:30 a.m. a cowardly terrorist, sent by the south Korean "government", led by the evil traitor Lee Myung Bak, attempted to attack the D.P.R.K.!


But, as usual for our heroic armed forces - led by the victoriously Military First Policy(*), created by the Dear Leader Kim Jong Il - thwarted the attempt immediately! By terminating the infiltrator directly and definetly on the spot!!


The responsibility for the incident rests entirely with the south side. The south should make a clear apology (for the attampted terrorist attack) and take measures to prevent the recurrence of a similar incident!


D.P.R.K. Ministry of Peaceful Unification
K.P.A. Department of Peace and Love

Pyongyang, Juche 97.7.12



* i.e. "Shoot first and never ask/shoot to kill!"

 

 


Related stuff:

North Blames South Over Tourist Killing (Korea..)

Death at Geumgang: More Questions Than Answers (..Times)

 

 




트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1558

7.12 反(李)정부 투쟁 추천


It's almost some days ago, that the S.K. bourgeois (English) media mentioned the anti-US-beef/anti-gov't movement and its activities (*).


Now, the movement is preparing for the next "mass rally" - i.e. the "7.12 Candlelight Culture Festival" - against the LMB-gov't.


But - to be somehow realistic - it could be the "last battle"! While last Friday 30,000 people joined the "Candlelight Vigil", today - the event was mainly organized by the KCTU - only 1,500 people paricipated at the final "Candlelight Culture Festival" in downtown Seoul (Chyeonggyecheon Plaza), according to Chamsesang.

[7.11]KCTU Report
[7.11]Tong-il News Report


Anyway, let's see what will be happen tomorrow! The "event", according to the organizers, starts at 7 p.m. on City Hall Plaza (oops~ although the "authorities" banned any gathering there!!??) and will last until the next morning: "7/13(일) 0~4시: 시민참여 프로그램"!


.."anti2mb" (7.05).

 


* Are the candles being blown out? (K.Herald, 7.09)

 
Weekday candlelight vigils against American beef imports are expected to be scaled back as the main organizers focus on the rallies set for this weekend and next Thursday, July 17 - Constitution Day.


The organizers' decision came amid growing criticism about the increasingly violent and political nature of the protests, and rising concern over the economic and social ramifications of the demonstrations...

 
The coalition of about 1,700 civic groups, which has organized the vigils since late April, said on Monday that rallies on weekdays will be organized voluntarily by other various civic groups.


"This measure is to make the vigils more persistent and stronger in due consideration of the new circumstances," said a senior coalition member. "There needs to be some coordination among civic groups to organize weekday vigils, which will be voluntarily staged."


The coalition said it will continue to protest the resumption of U.S. beef imports by launching a campaign soon to stop the sale and distribution of the beef.


The coalition has been pondering how to keep the candle flames alive. Observers believe the rainy and hot weather coupled with fatigue over the protests could erode the will of the people taking part in the vigils.


Some argue that protests would not be effective as both Seoul and Washington consider their demand - a complete renegotiation of the import deal - unacceptable. Shop owners near the vigils also have denounced protesters as threatening their livelihood with street demonstrations every night.


The religious groups, which served to restore peace in the vigils since late last month, also stepped back. Buddhist and Christian groups, which were scheduled to hold prayer vigils yesterday, put off their plans, citing restoration of peace in the vigils. They, however, vowed to rejoin the demonstrations if violence erupts again.


Observers say Christian and Buddhist groups backed away as they fear their participation in the vigils - which could be viewed as political rather than representing their religious values - could prompt divisions in their organizations.


On Monday, some Catholic church members reproached the "political action" of the progressive priests' group as being "absolutely wrong and what the church disapproves of."


Although the coalition has taken a backseat during weekday vigils, small groups of vigil participants are likely to lead the protests, taking the place of the coalition.


The Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, the nation's second largest umbrella labor group, said it will continue to protest should the anti-U.S. beef coalition fail to lead them.


"The KCTU will definitely play the part which the coalition cannot do," KCTU Chairman Lee Seok-hang told reporters.


"We will struggle and protest (the beef imports) until the end. Some may think the candle lights are gone, but we will continue to keep them alive."





트랙백(0)   덧글(1) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1557

6.25 전쟁/대학살 추천

The Time magazine (last Sunday, 7.06) reported that the...


US Allowed Korean Mass Executions


The American colonel, troubled by what he was hearing, tried to stall at first. But the declassified record shows he finally told his South Korean counterpart it "would be permitted" to machine-gun 3,500 political prisoners, to keep them from joining approaching enemy forces.


In the early days of the Korean War, other American officers observed, photographed and confidentially reported on such wholesale executions by their South Korean ally, a secretive slaughter believed to have killed 100,000 or more leftists and supposed sympathizers, usually without charge or trial, in a few weeks in mid-1950.


Extensive archival research by The Associated Press has found no indication Far East commander Gen. Douglas MacArthur took action to stem the summary mass killing, knowledge of which reached top levels of the Pentagon and State Department in Washington, where it was classified "secret" and filed away.


Now, a half-century later, the South Korean government's Truth and Reconciliation Commission is investigating what happened in that summer of terror, a political bloodbath largely hidden from history, unlike the communist invaders' executions of southern rightists, which were widely publicized and denounced at the time.


In the now-declassified record at the U.S. National Archives and other repositories, the Korean investigators will find an ambivalent U.S. attitude in 1950 — at times hands-off, at times disapproving.


"The most important thing is that they did not stop the executions," historian Jung Byung-joon, a member of the 2-year-old commission, said of the Americans. "They were at the crime scene, and took pictures and wrote reports."


They took pictures in July 1950 at the slaughter of dozens of men at one huge killing field outside the central city of Daejeon. Between 3,000 and 7,000 South Koreans are believed to have been shot there by their own military and police, and dumped into mass graves, said Kim Dong-choon, the commission member overseeing the investigation of these government killings.


The bones of Koh Chung-ryol's father are there somewhere, and the 57-year-old woman believes South Koreans alone are not to blame.


"Although we can't present concrete evidence, we bereaved families believe the United States has some responsibility for this," she told the AP, as she visited one of the burial sites in the quiet Sannae valley.


Frank Winslow, a military adviser at Daejeon in those desperate days long ago, is one American who feels otherwise.


The Koreans were responsible for their own actions, said the retired Army lieutenant colonel, 81. "The Koreans were sovereign. To me, there was never any question that the Koreans were in charge," he said in a telephone interview from his home in Bellingham, Wash.


The brutal, hurried elimination of tens of thousands of their countrymen, subject of a May 19 AP report, was the climax to a years-long campaign by South Korea's right-wing leaders.


In 1947, two years after Washington and Moscow divided Korea into southern and northern halves, a U.S. military government declared the Korean Labor Party, the southern communists, to be illegal. President Syngman Rhee's southern regime, gaining sovereignty in 1948, suppressed all leftist political activity, put down a guerrilla uprising and held up to 30,000 political prisoners by the time communist North Korea invaded on June 25, 1950.


As war broke out, southern authorities also rounded up members of the 300,000-strong National Guidance Alliance, a "re-education" body to which they had assigned leftist sympathizers, and whose membership quotas also were filled by illiterate peasants lured by promises of jobs and other benefits.


Commission investigators, extrapolating from initial evidence and surveys of family survivors, believe most alliance members were killed in the wave of executions.


On June 29, 1950, as the southern army and its U.S. advisers retreated southward, reports from Seoul said the conquering northerners had emptied the southern capital's prisons, and ex-inmates were reinforcing the new occupation regime.


In a confidential narrative he later wrote for Army historians, Lt. Col. Rollins S. Emmerich, a senior U.S. adviser, described what then happened in the southern port city of Busan, formerly known as Pusan.


Emmerich was told by a subordinate that a South Korean regimental commander, determined to keep Busan's political prisoners from joining the enemy, planned "to execute some 3500 suspected peace time Communists, locked up in the local prison," according to the declassified 78-page narrative, first uncovered by the newspaper Busan Ilbo at the U.S. National Archives.


Emmerich wrote that he summoned the Korean, Col. Kim Chong-won, and told him the enemy would not reach Busan in a few days as Kim feared, and that "atrocities could not be condoned."


But the American then indicated conditional acceptance of the plan.


"Colonel Kim promised not to execute the prisoners until the situation became more critical," wrote Emmerich, who died in 1986. "Colonel Kim was told that if the enemy did arrive to the outskirts of (Busan) he would be permitted to open the gates of the prison and shoot the prisoners with machine guns."


This passage, omitted from the published Army history, is the first documentation unearthed showing advance sanction by the U.S. military for such killings.


"I think his (Emmerich's) word is so significant," said Park Myung-lim, a South Korean historian of the war and adviser to the investigative commission.


As that summer wore on, and the invaders pressed their attack on the southern zone, Busan-area prisoners were shot by the hundreds, Korean and foreign witnesses later said.


Emmerich wrote that soon after his session with Kim, he met with South Korean officials in Daegu, 55 miles north of Busan, and persuaded them "at that time" not to execute 4,500 prisoners immediately, as planned. Within weeks, hundreds were being executed in the Daegu area.


The bloody anticommunist purge, begun immediately after the invasion, is believed by the fall of 1950 to have filled some 150 mass graves in secluded spots stretching to the peninsula's southernmost counties. Commissioner Kim said the commission's estimate of 100,000 dead is "very conservative." The commission later this month will resume excavating massacre sites, after having recovered remains of more than 400 people at four sites last year.


The AP has extensively researched U.S. military and diplomatic archives from the Korean War in recent years, at times relying on once-secret documents it obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests and declassification reviews. The declassified U.S. record and other sources offer further glimpses of the mass killings.


A North Korean newspaper said 1,000 prisoners were slain in Incheon, just west of Seoul, in late June 1950 — a report partly corroborated by a declassified U.S. Eighth Army document of July 1950 saying "400 Communists" had been killed in Incheon. The North Korean report claimed a U.S. military adviser had given the order.


As the front moved south, in July's first days, Air Force intelligence officer Donald Nichols witnessed and photographed the shooting of an estimated 1,800 prisoners in Suwon, 20 miles south of Seoul, Nichols reported in a little-noted memoir in 1981, a decade before his death.


Around the same time, farther south, the Daejeon killings began.


Winslow recalled he declined an invitation to what a senior officer called the "turkey shoot" outside the city, but other U.S. officers did attend, taking grisly photos of the human slaughter that would be kept classified for a half-century.


Journalist Alan Winnington, of the British communist Daily Worker newspaper, entered Daejeon with North Korean troops after July 20 and reported that the killings were carried out for three days in early July and two or three days in mid-July.


He wrote that his witnesses claimed jeeploads of American officers "supervised the butchery." Secret CIA and Army intelligence communications reported on the Daejeon and Suwon killings as early as July 3, but said nothing about the U.S. presence or about any U.S. oversight.


In mid-August, MacArthur, in Tokyo, learned of the mass shooting of 200 to 300 people near Daegu, including women and a 12- or 13-year-old girl. A top-secret Army report from Korea, uncovered by AP research, told of the "extreme cruelty" of the South Korean military policemen. The bodies fell into a ravine, where hours later some "were still alive and moaning," wrote a U.S. military policeman who happened on the scene.


Although MacArthur had command of South Korean forces from early in the war, he took no action on this report, other than to refer it to John J. Muccio, U.S. ambassador in South Korea. Muccio later wrote that he urged South Korean officials to stage executions humanely and only after due process of law.


The AP found that during this same period, on Aug. 15, Brig. Gen. Francis W. Farrell, chief U.S. military adviser to the South Koreans, recommended the U.S. command investigate the executions. There was no sign such an inquiry was conducted. A month later, the Daejeon execution photos were sent to the Pentagon in Washington, with a U.S. colonel's report that the South Koreans had killed "thousands" of political prisoners.


The declassified record shows an equivocal U.S. attitude continuing into the fall, when Seoul was retaken and South Korean forces began shooting residents who collaborated with the northern occupiers.


When Washington's British allies protested, Dean Rusk, assistant secretary of state, told them U.S. commanders were doing "everything they can to curb such atrocities," according to a Rusk memo of Oct. 28, 1950.


But on Dec. 19, W.J. Sebald, State Department liaison to MacArthur, cabled Secretary of State Dean Acheson to say MacArthur's command viewed the killings as a South Korean "internal matter" and had "refrained from taking any action."


It was the British who took action, according to news reports at the time. On Dec. 7, in occupied North Korea, British officers saved 21 civilians lined up to be shot, by threatening to shoot the South Korean officer responsible. Later that month, British troops seized "Execution Hill," outside Seoul, to block further mass killings there.


To quiet the protests, the South Koreans barred journalists from execution sites and the State Department told diplomats to avoid commenting on atrocity reports. Earlier, the U.S. Embassy in London had denounced as "fabrication" Winnington's Daily Worker reporting on the Daejeon slaughter. The Army eventually blamed all the thousands of Daejeon deaths on the North Koreans, who in fact had carried out executions of rightists there and elsewhere.


An American historian of the Korean War, the University of Chicago's Bruce Cumings, sees a share of U.S. guilt in what happened in 1950.


"After the fact — with thousands murdered — the U.S. not only did nothing, but covered up the Daejeon massacres," he said...


http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1820559,00.html

 


Related:

US wavered over S. Korean executions (Washington Post)


 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1556

대만(臺灣) 공산주의 금기 추천

For decades - since 1949 - Taiwan, beside South Korea, was the main fortress against socialism/communism (respectively any progressive idea based on anti-capitalism/anti-imperialism) in East Asia. This meant that any democratic/progressive opposition was completely forbidden. Until the 1980's Taiwan was ruled by martial law and tens of thousands of dissidents were arrested, tortured and/or killed. Of course there was also complete no freedom of press..


But two weeks ago (6.26) the Taiwanese daily newspaper China Post "dared" to headline an editorial with:


 Congratulations to Taiwan's Communist Party!


Usually after something like that (at least) the chief editor would be arrested and jailed for many years and the newspaper closed forever!


But (contrary to S. Korea!!) in Taiwan the "Cold War" ended - at least since 6.20!


At that day, according to the Central News Agency, Taiwan's constitutional court/Council of Grand Justices(CGJ) ruled that it's against the human rights to oppress the freedom of speech and organization. And, according to the CGJ, Tawan's constitution is "based on the human rights". So, because of that, the CGJ ruled, that it's illegal to ban/oppress the political opposition and its organizations and media, even it's based on the ideas of Socialism, Communism, Marxism/Leninism etc...



Related:
Congratulations to Taiwan's Communist Party (China Post, 6.26)




트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1555

[7.5] MTU 캠페인 추천

While the expected 600 foreigners failed to show up on the Anti-Candlelight Protest announced for last Sat. in downtown Seoul (actually only 300 people attended the "event"!!^^) activists and supporters of MTU joined the massive Anti-gov't Rally and combined it with their own campaign against the ongoing wave of crackdown (by the S.K. gov't. "authorities") on undocumented migrant workers in general and MTU activists in particular:


  

7월 5일 오후 5시부터 8시 30분까지 촛불집회가 열리는 서울시청 광장에서
'이주노동자 권리찾기' 캠페인을 진행하였습니다.


광우병 쇠고기 수입 반대 촛불집회에 참가한 수많은 시민들이 이주노동자 권리찾기
캠페인에 함께해 주셨습니다.


줄을 서서 서명운동에 동참하고 모금도 해주시는 등 호응이 너무나 좋았습니다.
"한국사회에서 이주노동자들이 올바른 인권과 노동권을 찾을 수 있도록 연대하자",
"단속추방이 너무 심해 촛불집회에도 나오기 힘든 이주노동자들의 권리를 찾자" 등
우리의 주장과 호소에 너무나 많은 시민들이 함께해 주셨습니다. 모금도 42만원이나
되었고, 서명용지가 모자랄 정도였습니다.


참여해 주신 모든 분들께 감사드립니다.

 

 

 

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1554

反(李)정부 투쟁 #13 추천

1. While the S.K. ruling class and its gov't is assuming that the protest movement is "short before the final collapse", the 'security forces' are threaten now another part of the society with repressions:
Police Warn Religious Leaders Over Candlelit Protests (K. Times, 7.07)

2. Last week Scot B. (
www.kingbaeksu.com) published following interesting(*) impression/view about the recent protest events in Seoul(**):

 

Tonight I walked to City Hall at around 7:30pm and was disgusted by what I saw. A group at Ch'onggye Plaza was protesting human rights abuses in China, but all of 5 people were stopping to listen to a speech that was being made. Nearby, on the corner by Seoul Finance Center, another group was protesting against global warming and advocating green living and vegetarianism, but again nobody was even listening. Then I went to City Hall, and it was flooded by people listening to a monk give a speech about the need to renegotiate the beef deal. I'm sorry, but why is a vegetarian monk promoting eating beef at all? Shouldn't he be calling for outright cancellation?


I left after a few minutes and spoke with the anti-global warming people once again. They had a large-screen TV showing how cows produce methane gas which in turn increases global warming. I spoke with the nice halmoni there for a while and asked her what she thought of the beef issue. At first she said she didn't care because she was a vegetarian, but then after some prodding, she said, "Those people have low consciousness" and went on to talk about how traditionally Koreans didn't even eat much meat, and that the cattle industry in both the US and Korea was harming the environment in serious ways. I agree with her completely. She ended by saying, "Those people don't seem to really understand what's going on in the world we live in. All I want to do is give some information about the Earth." Too bad nobody really cared about what she had to say, because they were all too busy protesting their right to cram their faces with "safe" beef at City Hall.


Well, if they are really as radical as they fancy themselves to be, they should simply announce that they will stop eating beef entirely and start actually giving a fuck about the environment for a change. I mean, I cannot even begin to imagine how much trash has been generated by two months of daily protests comprising millions of people.


I must say that while 2MB certainly sucks, this movement is starting to seem more and more morally bankrupt the closer I look at it...


Well, it’s a very long post, and must be read in its entirety:

A Funny Thing Happened to Me on the Way to City Hall Tonight

Yesterday during a "conversation" with Jamie (TwoKoreasBlog) he wrote following:


"..I have to say that at this point, this whole protest movement can be characterized as the Korean left being sore losers.


They fucked up in the last elections (Dec. '07 and April '08), but that's their fault not Lee's. An equivalent analogy would be if a runner lost a marathon race because he didn't prepare or train hard enough beforehand, and then blamed the winner for his loss.


Again, at this point they're simply being sore losers. Everyone knew what Lee was about prior to the Dec. election. The progressives and the left here have no one to blame but themselves.


Last night people were telling me in all seriousness that Lee needed to be assassinated."

 

* Well, that's interesting, but - probably - it's not reflecting the entire "reality"...

** Related stuff (incl. nearly 100 comments to Scot B's impressions):

Excellent Commentary on Demonstrations (The Marmot's Hole)





트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1553

反(李)정부 투쟁 #12 추천


First of all: From yesterday evening until today's morning about 500,000 people took the streets in Seoul to protest against the (policies of the) current S.K. gov't/the LeeMB administration.
500,000 S. Koreans Stage Anti-US Beef Rallies (Seoul Times)
VoP Report
KCTU Report
NewsCham Report
Tong-il News Report

But the most important question is, if the protest movement isn't on its end: What comes next? Despite the motto of y'day's protest - "People's Victory Day" - there is (until now) definetely NO people's victory in sight! LeeMB will/must continue with his policy, because he "only" represents the ruling (capitalist) system. And also not unimportant: Is there any (real) alternative to LMB and the ruling GNP??

Related stuff:
Candlelight Vigil Faces Calls for End (K. Times)

 






 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1552

촛불시위 반대집회^^ 추천


REACTIONARIES OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!


Yo, tomorrow (Saturday) afternoon and evening could present us a very special, extraordinary event/performance in downtown Seoul!


The S.K. daily newspaper Hanguk Ilbo reported that "with tensions between protesters and anti-protest protesters on the rise" (just remember my yesterday's contribution!), hundreds of resident foreigners will be attending an

 "Anti-Candlelight Protest Demonstration" :


The "Citizens Alliance Against Radical Illegal Candlelight Demonstrations"

(NoNoDemo) announced before yesterday that 500-600 foreign students and about 100 English teachers planned to attend a rally set for 5–8pm on July 5. Some 100 foreign laborers and Korean-Americans will also attend.


An official from the group said hundreds of resident foreigners have expressed their intention to voluntarily attend the demonstration. The official said that in the face of loud demands for the beef import deal to be renegotiated, the foreigners could not voice their own opinions about US beef, and that after they learned of the alliance’s online cafe, they contacted it looking to participate. He said the largest number of foreigners would be students in their 20s—30s.


He noted that the students not only wished to oppose the radical demonstrations, but also ask the candle crowd to pay attention to North Korean human rights.


Foreigners from all over, including the United States, Australia, Canada, Europe and Japan would attend.


Korean-Americans plan to attend following a performance asking the protesters to raise their candles instead for North Korean human rights. According to the alliance, the protest will also put to rest arguments that Americans don’t eat 30-month-old beef.


The anti-protest protesters will be protected by some 300 volunteer body guards from an association of ex-North Korean soldiers (*) who have defected to the South. The alliance official said this was because previous protests have met with friction with the candle crowd, and they wished for no more.


The demonstration is expected to get some 1,000 participants, making it the largest counter-demonstration yet. The demonstration will take place at the same time as a major anti-US beef demonstration, so some are worried about a potential conflict.


* Harrharr.. that seems to be a f... good idea!! Just imagine: "ex-N.K. soldiers" are meeting thousands of KCTU militants and other "skilled street fighters"! Of course, very likely, at least 10,000 of the notorious riot cops will be also at the scene.. (BTW.. it will be - once again - "good oportunity" for "activists" of the paramilitary HID and other similar semi-fascist gangster organisations, supporting the current S.K. gov't, to come out of their dirty holes!!)


Foreigners to Join Protest Against Anti-US Beef Rally (K. Times)

촛불시위 반대집회에 국내 거주 외국인 대규모 참여키로 (쿠키뉴스)

Foreigners & Ex-North Korean Soldiers to Protest Beef Protesters (ROK Drop)

Why Don’t You Raise Candles for the North Koreans? (DailyNK)


But despite all any possible - or better said impossible!! - efforts by the S.K. (and their affiliated foreign) reactionaries to disturb the current anti-gov't movement (and this includes also many migrant workers, organized in the MTU!!!):


        THE STRUGGLE GOES ON!!!      

(according to KCTU's struggle plan: at least from Saturday afternoon until Sunday 10 p.m.)



PS:
And the S.K. reactionary idiots are preparing for another "highlight"!!! (according to y'day's Money Today):


Conservative groups will be holding a US beef tasting party for some 10,000 people in downtown Seoul on July 12...
Organizers plan to get the beef for free from a Korean-American rancher in the United States.
One conservative group member said the event would be an opportunity to promote the safety of US beef to the public.

1만명 美쇠고기 시식파티 열린다

 




트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1551

反'조중동'!! 추천

Yesterday night a group of gangsters, organized in the Headquarters Of Intelligence Detachment (HID) attacked the office and activists of the New Progressive Party (NPP) in Seoul. (*)


This action is (very likely) the result of the - since weeks - ongoing massive discriminating propaganda (**) by the bourgeois reactionary S.K. press, such as Chosun ilbo, JoongAng Ilbo and Dong-A Ilbo (aka "ChoJoongDong"/조중동 - THE main voices of the S.K. ruling class!!) against the current anti-gov't movement.


With this kind of propaganda the bourgeois press (i.e. the ruling class) is creating a climate of witch-hunt in the S.K. society! And possibly it's just a matter of time when one incited person and/or a gang of reactionaries (and there are still quite a lot of them in S.K./Some of them you can call without a doubt FASCIST!!) taking really "direct action", incl. murder...


* Today's Hankyoreh published following about the "incident":



Members of the New Progressive Party try to fix the party’s broken signboard at their headquarters on July 1. The signboard was broken by members of an association of former members of the Headquarters Of Intelligence Detachment, the seat of South Korea’s secret counterintelligence operation. On the evening, members of the association made a assault at the headquarters of NPP, and resulted in property damage, some persons of injuries and five arrests, .


According to an NPP official, five members of the association arrived at the NPP’s headquarters shouting, “Come out Jin Joong-gwon! We will kill all communists!” Jin, a journalist and activist who is known for his criticism of both conservatives and liberals alike, has been active in broadcasting reports from the site of the candlelight protests since they began on May 2.


During assault of the association members, one woman of NPP was injured and a man of NPP hospitalized. Jin was also injured..


http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_entertainment/296545.html


Related report/article:

보수단체, 진보신당에 난입하여 당직자 폭행등 난동 (진보신당)

Pro-Government Activists Attack Left-Wing Party (Korea Times)



** Here you can "enjoy" some "beautiful" examples of the bourgeois propaganda by "ChoJoongDong" against the current anti-gov't movement:

Anti-U.S. activists lead protests (JoongAng Ilbo, 6.28)

Anarchy in the republic (JoongAng Ilbo, 6.30)

Legitimate Protesters or Hooligans? (Chosun Ilbo, 6.24)

The Real Identity of the Mad Cow Fearmongers (Chosun Ilbo, 6.13)



Related stuff:

Anti-US Groups Linked to Beef Protests (ROK Drop/GI Korea, 6.16)

Anti-US Groups Show Their True Colors (ROK Drop, 6.18)

 

 



트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1549

내일(水): '총파업' 추천

  

Well, tomorrow there will be the next "highlight" for the (current) anti-gov't struggle in S. Korea: KCTU's "General Strike" (*)

 

민주노총

투쟁대회
7.2, 18시 ~ 7.3, 00시, 서울시청 앞


The central strike rally/demonstration will be staged tomorrow(Wednesday) at 6 p.m. on (surprise, surprise!!) Seoul's City Hall Plaza (until after midnight, according to KCTU)!


BTW... The LeeMB gov't "vowed to deal harshly with the general strike to be staged by the KCTU on Wednesday, branding it politically motivated and illegal", according to Chosun Ilbo (7.01).


* Today's Korea Herald is reporting following about the "General Strike":


Tens of thousands of union workers will stage a joint strike tomorrow in protest against the resumption of U.S. beef imports.


Workers at major carmakers including Hyundai Motor Co. will join the action called by the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions.


The government pledged a stern response. The Labor Ministry declared the planned walkout illegal because it is not related to corporate issues such as wage and work conditions.


"We will fight and damage production," warned Lee Suk-haeng, leader of the labor umbrella group, during a news conference before yesterday...


Tomorrow, more than 200,000 will join the strike nationwide, he said. Its members will gather in Seoul from tomorrow through Saturday to join candlelight vigils against the beef imports.


This will be a start of the annual summer strife, which will be longer and fiercer this year than before, he threatened.


"The summer struggle will go on well beyond July and I expect it will continue through September given the government's plan to restructure the public sector," he said.


The action comes after a general strike by truck drivers between June 11-19, which has been estimated to cost the nation about $6.6 billion in lost trade.


The government and business organizations demanded the union cancel the plan, which will devastate an economy already suffering from record-high oil prices and a sagging global market.


Workers at Hyundai Motor, Korea's top car maker, plan to stage a two-day partial strike as part of the nationwide protests and its own collective action for wage increase.


The union is part of the Korean Metal Workers' Union, a key member of the KCTU. The metal industry union, consisting of about 230 companies, approved the strike plan on Sunday with the support of 76 percent of its voting members.


The Hyundai Motor union said some 45,000 will stop work for two hours each on Wednesday and Thursday. They will not work overtime until the settlement of wage talks.


They demand the company come to automobile industry-level negotiations, in which labor unions will have greater leverage. The carmaker rejected it.


Workers at Kia Motors Corp., GM Daewoo Auto & Technology Co., and Ssangyong Motor Co. will join the two-day partial work stoppage, union officials at the companies said.


The Labor Ministry refused to recognize the legitimacy of the planned strike.


It said the action is motivated by the political purpose of blocking U.S. beef imports. Especially, Hyundai workers did not sit for a wage negotiation with management before undertaking industrial action, which violates the law, the ministry said...


The KCTU rebuffed the criticism. "The beef matter is directly related to the health and everyday life of workers. It is natural that we fight over the issue," Lee said...



 

 

 

 

 

트랙백(0)   덧글(0) 이 문서의 주소:http://blog.jinbo.net/CINA/?pid=1548