사이드바 영역으로 건너뛰기

게시물에서 찾기international news

437개의 게시물을 찾았습니다.

  1. 2005/10/28
    이라크 戰...
    no chr.!
  2. 2005/10/27
    Fortress Europe is Killing Again
    no chr.!
  3. 2005/10/24
    시리아戰??
    no chr.!
  4. 2005/10/11
    Fortress Europe...
    no chr.!
  5. 2005/10/08
    The Lunatic With a "Vision"
    no chr.!
  6. 2005/10/07
    모로코, 스페인, 이주자...(1)
    no chr.!
  7. 2005/10/07
    RIEN NE VA PLUS! 10.4 총파업
    no chr.!
  8. 2005/10/01
    Fortress Europe, Germany...(2)
    no chr.!
  9. 2005/09/20
    German General Election... # 2
    no chr.!
  10. 2005/09/20
    The German General Election...
    no chr.!

팔레스티나. 1.25 총선거 #2

Hamas swaps bullets for ballots in attempt to sweep away old guard
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1688818,00.html


Islamist movement poised to be the second largest party and win Gaza outright

Wednesday January 18, 2006
The Guardian


The Israeli policemen who wrestled Mohammed Abu Teir off to jail for illegal election campaigning in East Jerusalem this week probably did more to pile on the votes for the red-bearded sheikh than all the handshakes and sloganeering. Sheikh Abu Teir is number two on the list of Hamas candidates for next week's election to the Palestinian parliament, but Israel has barred what it classifies as a terrorist organisation from campaigning, so the group appears on the ballot as the "Change and Reform" movement.

"The police told us we were Hamas. We told them we are Change and Reform. We went around and around. They wanted us to admit we were Hamas so they could charge us, but we didn't," said Sheikh Abu Teir.

The police would not have found it very difficult to have made the link. Sheikh Abu Teir was released from prison six months ago after the latest stint of a total of 25 years in Israeli jails for serving in Hamas's armed wing, for membership of a terrorist organisation and distributing weapons.

But locking up Hamas candidates - about a quarter are in Israeli jails - only bolsters their credibility among Palestinian voters, who generally see all security prisoners as political martyrs. It has helped fuel Hamas's surge in the polls to close to 40% of the vote, only marginally less than the establishment Fatah led by the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas. And the gap is closing.

After the election, the Islamist movement is almost certain to be the second largest party in the Palestinian parliament, and to win outright in the Gaza strip. That presents a dilemma for Israel, and the US and Europe, which must decide how to deal with an organisation they call terrorist but that has evident electoral support.

But it also poses a problem for Hamas, which has to define its role within a system built around a negotiated peace deal with a country the Islamist movement refuses to recognise.

To compete in the elections, Hamas has largely retreated from "armed resistance" - its strategy of murdering civilians in suicide bombings and shooting soldiers - in favour of a political pragmatism some Palestinian analysts believe will make it difficult for Hamas to return to a sustained violent campaign.

The Hamas manifesto hinted at the change when it left out any reference to the call in the group's founding charter for the destruction of the Jewish state.

"We were political since day one but the armed resistance was at the forefront," said Sheikh Abu Teir. "Now we studied the situation and we read the situation. There was a truce that ended at the beginning of this month and there is still quiet by us. That doesn't mean the possibility of resistance is ended but a political decision was made that political work is superseding the military work. That means we are investing in the present situation to the maximum."

Hamas boycotted the last Palestinian parliamentary election 10 years ago on the grounds that the Oslo peace accords were a surrender of Islamic lands, and menaced electors by declaring that anyone who voted was defying God.

But afterwards it increasingly infiltrated the political scene, building popular support by providing myriad social services as ordinary Palestinians grew increasingly disillusioned with the corruption and mismanagement of Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Authority.

The decision to capitalise on burgeoning popular support among Palestinians increasingly weary of violence was not unanimous in Hamas, and Sheikh Abu Tier says the organisation's prisoners in Israeli jails were instrumental in deciding that it should run for election. "The prisoners tipped the balance in favour of political participation. They are well educated. Many are professors, engineers, doctors. That was the result of vision. They were a decisive factor and I was one of them in favour," he said.

Hamas did well in local elections last year and bolstered its support in the run-up to next week's vote with a reputation for efficient, clean government in the towns it now governs, such as Qalqilya and Beit Hanoun.

"I was called in for interrogation in Jerusalem," said Sheikh Abu Tier. "The [Israeli] interrogator said to me: you people have credibility with the people. This is the testimony of the enemy."

But the rapid growth in political support for Hamas leaves it with the dilemma of whether to go into government with Fatah led by Mr Abbas, who is committed to negotiation over armed resistance and a state built on the occupied territories with no claim to Israel.

"We are going to decide whether to join the government according to its programme," said Mahmoud al-Zahar, one of the most prominent Hamas leaders in the occupied territories. "Our aim is not to cooperate with the Israelis economically, politically, socially, on security. They are the enemy. They killed our people. They are responsible for the long-standing suffering of the Palestinian people. So how can we cooperate with them?"

Sheikh Abu Teir says the continued rejection of cooperation excludes the possibility of negotiations. "The PLO negotiated with them for years and recognised them, and what did it get the Palestinians?" he said. "When Abbas says the platform for negotiations is Oslo, we all know who destroyed Oslo. What happened after 2000 [and the outbreak of the second intifada] destroyed everything that went before it."

But for all the insistence on both sides that it would be impossible to work together, Israeli officials and the military and Hamas mayors and councillors are already cooperating in the administration of towns such as Qalqilya. Israeli officials are privately admiring of the elected Hamas leaders they deal with, regarding them as being efficient and businesslike. Dr Zahar said that if Hamas were to win the election, and in a position to determine the Palestinian government's policy, it would look to the Arab world. He said the aim would not be to fight Israel but to ignore it.

"We have to run very effective self-defence and take responsibility economically, politically and socially through cooperation with the Arabs, not with the Israelis," he said. "We will reform this system, we have to be rid of the corruption. We are ready to establish an independent state on one square metre, but at the same time we will not renounce one square metre. Our first priority is not Israel but Palestine."

Mr Abbas has warned Hamas that whatever its view of Israel, it cannot remain an armed group and sit in parliament. The acting Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, has said that Hamas joining the Palestinian government would block peace efforts.

"There can be no progress with an administration in which there are terrorist organisations as members," he told the US president, George Bush, last week. The US has threatened to cut aid to the Palestinian Authority if Hamas joins the government without disarming, and the EU foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, has warned that money will be withheld if Hamas joins the administration without recognising Israel's right to exist.

Hamas leaders say the problem could be resolved by integrating the movement's fighters into the Palestinian security forces. But persuading Hamas to drop its charter calling for the destruction of Israel, and recognising the Jewish state's right to exist, is a more complicated matter.

"It's our land," said Dr Zahar. "Nobody among our sons and grandsons will accept Israel as a legal state. Historically, they occupied this land as the British occupied it. Israel is a foreign body. Not in this generation, not in the next generation, will we accept it here."

But asked if that meant Hamas would continue to try to destroy Israel, Dr Zahar said that would be for the next generation to decide.

 

 

Police arrest PFLP parliamentary candidate in East Jerusalem´ (Ha'aretz, 1.18)

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/671923.html

Jerusalem police on Wednesday arrested a parliamentary candidate from the radical Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, while he was holding a press conference in a hotel in East Jerusalem.

Abed Lafif Shehade is number 10 on the PFLP parliamentary list and heads the group's Jerusalem headquarters. Police also detained six other party officials in the conference, charging that the group was banned from campaigning in the city.

Earlier this week, police raided the offices of the left-wing party Fida and held five people for questioning. Police also raided Hamas election campaign headquarters and arrested three of the organization's parliamentary candidates as they were holding a press conference near Temple Mount.

Israel had threatened to bar Palestinian candidates from campaigning in East Jerusalem for the January 25 parliamentary elections. On Sunday, the cabinet said it would allow limited voting in the disputed city, but would not allow Palestinian militant groups, such as Hamas and the PFLP, to participate.

As the PFLP officials prepared to launch their campaign at the East Jerusalem hotel, plainclothes police walked in and arrested the seven party officials. Those that resisted were removed by force, said Jerusalem police spokesman Shmuel Ben-Ruby.

"It is not allowed in Jerusalem for any terror organization to make an election campaign," he said.

The PFLP, a small militant group, was behind several deadly attacks on Israel in recent years, including the assassination of Minister Rehavam Ze'evi in 2001.

 

 


 

 

Jenin raid by I"D"F... (J'lem Post, 1.18)

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1136361103663&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
 

 

Two soldiers were wounded - one moderately and one lightly - by Palestinian gunfire during an operation to arrest fugitives in Jenin.

Soldiers surrounded a house where one of the Fatah Tanzim-affiliated fugitives was believed to be hiding; a gunman opened fire at troops as he attempted to flee from the house, moderately wounding a soldier.

Soldiers returned fire, wounding the fugitive who was then detained and handed over to security officials for questioning.

As troops began to pull out of the city, more gunmen opened fire, lightly wounding another soldier.

During the operation, soldiers uncovered 10 pipe bombs in the city.

In Jenin, the Fatah Tanzim are considered to be the most active terror organization, responsible for numerous attacks against Israel.

Elsewhere in the West Bank, security forces arrested 12 Palestinian fugitives.

In Tsurif, southwest of Bethlehem, soldiers surrounded a house where a fugitive was believed to be hiding. Shortly after, they spotted a Palestinian fleeing from the building; they opened fire at his lower body.

The man was wounded lightly and taken to a hospital in Israel.

Soon after, it was discovered that he was the Islamic Jihad fugitive the troops had intended to arrest.

In the same operation, two additional fugitives were arrested.

In villages north of Tulkarm, four Islamic Jihad fugitives were arrested. In Ramallah, one Fatah Tanzim fugitive was caught.

In Bethlehem, one Hamas man and one Fatah Tanzim-affiliated fugitive were arrested.

In Hebron, one suspect involved in terror was arrested, and in Yata, south of the city, security forces arrested a weapons dealer.

In the Gaza Strip, shots were fired at an IDF post located near the southern Gaza security fence.

 

진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

팔레스티나. 1.25 총선거 #1

Yesterday(1.11) Jerusalem Post(the propaganda paper of the Israeli rightwing.., in my opinion...) published following article:

 

'Hamas win would destroy PA'

 

The security establishment painted a grim picture of the aftermath of the upcoming Palestinian legislative elections, warning that a strong Hamas victory would lead to the total destruction of the Palestinian Authority, the only body Israel has been able to negotiate with. Security officials warned that the new situation will have severe repercussions on future dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians.

Describing the "no-win situation" Israel will be forced to reckon with, security officials declared that a significant Hamas win may spur Fatah factions to stir up trouble and resort to violence, perceiving the move as the only way to serve its interests and reach Hamas's level of popularity. "Everything achieved by Israel and the PA in the past will be lost," a security official said Tuesday.

If PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas decides on the other hand to postpone the elections at the last minute, or resign, the decision could spur Hamas to renew its violence against Israel.

"All in all, the elections will not pass quietly," an official said.

Rivalry and tension surround the different Fatah factions vying to be elected. A Hamas victory means there will be no mutual base for Israel to enter any kind of dialogue, said the officials, adding that no one in Hamas - even Ismail Haniya, considered a pragmatist - would agree to recognize the State of Israel or put terror aside for the sake of entering a dialogue. Israel would have no proper Palestinian leadership to address.

"The future looks bleak. It is clear that, whatever the outcome, Israel will be faced with an upsurge in violence and a breakdown in the situation," an official said.

"No matter how you look at it, nothing good will come out of the situation. It is a shame that the US is unable to understand the situation and the new reality Israel will be faced with. It is possible that we will witness the last democratic elections to take place in the PA," one of the officials said.

The officials were unwilling to divulge how the situation would affect the Gaza terminal crossings or other projects and agreements reached between Israel and the PA in the past.

According to estimates that have reached the security establishment, officials assess that Abbas will postpone the elections at the last minute in an attempt to avoid confronting an almost certain Hamas victory. Recent reports that reached the security establishment portray Abbas as a weak soul incapable of taking charge of the situation. The aides that surround Abbas are pegging their hopes on his failure and perceive him as a man unable to cope with the internal pressures he is confronted with. Security officials did not rule out the possibility that Abbas may resign.

Abbas's biggest mistake, they said, was the strategic decision not to confront Hamas, because that enabled Hamas to continue with its ongoing activities uninterrupted. Abbas's weakness can be seen in his failure to uphold any of the agreements he signed with Israel. "In West Bank cities where the PA received security control he failed to disarm fugitives and reign in extremists," an official said.

The chaos and lawlessness that rage through the PA-controlled areas continues without any real attempts by the PA leadership to halt the situation and restore law and order, the officials added.

Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz's announcement on Tuesday that Israel will permit east Jerusalemites to vote in the upcoming Palestinian elections took some security officials by surprise. "The Ministry of Foreign Affairs recommended that Israel refrain from making its stand on the issue official and wait until the last minute in order to evade being blamed by the Palestinians for possible hitches," one security official said.

The official noted, however, that Israel had in 1996 informed the Palestinians that east Jerusalemites would be permitted to vote in Israeli post offices in east Jerusalem as well as in Abu Dis. "We are reverting to the same policy we upheld in past elections," he said.

Israel said it was willing to facilitate the process on election day. However, the officials warned, under no circumstances would Israel allow Hamas activists or others belonging to terror groups to campaign in east Jerusalem.

One official disagreed with the decision, implying that the ban on Hamas campaigning was "a kind of absurdity, a situation whereby east Jerusalemites armed with envelopes will cast their votes in ballot boxes located inside Israeli post offices."

The officials also added that, in the West Bank, if a Hamas fugitive arrives at a checkpoint he will be arrested by security forces.

"Israel does not intend to initiate any operations on the Palestinian election day, but if a wanted fugitive shows up at a checkpoint he will be arrested. The Palestinians have been informed of this," an official said.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1136361055346&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull 

 

At the same day the more "liberal democratic" daily Ha'aretz wrote this:

Hamas' platform more moderate

 

Well, and if you feel really boring, you have nothing better to do... read the "Talkbacks"(over 250.., including discussings about the massacre in Sabra and Shatila..) here("East Jerusalem Palestinians will be able to vote in PLC elections"):

http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/spages/667685.html

진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

이스라엘: 샤론 시대... #1

...IS OVER, DEFINETLY!

But what will follow?

 

Following article was published in the German(bourgeois) magazine Der Spiegel before yesterday(1.06).

 

After Sharon

The Rise of the Hard-liners?

By Pierre Heumann

 

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon lies on his deathbed, and alongside him perhaps the hope of peace in the Middle East. Iran's rabble-rousing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threatens the fragile situation -- potentially leading to a coflict that would engulf more than just the region.

 

Ariel Sharon leaves the political stage in Israel as a hard-liner who turned into a statesman. However, to praise him as a prince of peace just because he pulled Israel out of the Gaza Strip would be an exaggeration. He never tried to negotiate with the Palestinians, nor did he expect fine promises in return. He saw them not as partners but as untrustworthy enemies.

Sharon turned his back on Gaza because he could hear the ticking of a demographic time bomb: 8,000 settlers verus 1.3 million Palestinians just seemed like bad odds. As a general -- which he's remained to this day -- he crowed about "unilateral withdrawal" once it was clear that his troops couldn't hold the front.

Sharon just strove for conflict management: He wanted to reduce Israeli-Palestinian friction points. This led to a mini-solution that doesn't promise harmony -- but it's still a step in the right direction, since it allows for the founding of a Palestinian state.

Sharon has never said in public whether he'd pull out of the West Bank, or at least from areas of it. But anyone who listens carefully to his advisers and ministers can guess how he imagined the future. Justice Minister Tsipi Livni said two months ago that it wouldn't take much imagination to see where Sharon pictured the borders of Israel -- and Livni, at the time, was making a tour of the new wall that separates Israel from West Jordan.

In other words: little settlements would be dismantled and two or three big settlement blocks erected. The Palestinian state would be smaller than most Palestinians imagine it today; but expecting more from an Israeli government would simply be unrealistic. Without Sharon, though, even this mini-solution could slip into obscurity.

Danger of a third Intifada

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' power is visibly crumbling. He makes no effort to push through his declared goal: the disarmament of the militants. Abbas has surrenders to opponents within his government and has left the door open to the spread of terrorist activities, making the situation uncomfortable for Israel even after their withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. In the last three months extremists have launched more than 200 rockets on Israel's border region from Gaza, which should in theory be under Abbas' control.

Projectiles with a range of 25 kilometers are being developed so they can attack targets in the center of Israel. Escalation is pre-programmed. In light of this toleration of violence the hopes of the Palestinian Authorities of being accepted for peace negotiations by Sharon's possible successors are fading.

At the same time the radical Islamist group Hamas can expect to beat Fatah in the upcoming elections on 25 January. If Hamas make into the Palestinian government there will be a major political shake-up. Abbas could try to postpone the election so as to avoid defeat of his Fatah party but this scenario offers little hope: Hamas would presumably respond with a third Intifada.

The threat from Iran


Developments in Iran are even more worrying. While the European Union and United States attempt to use diplomatic methods to dissuade the ayatollahs from developing nuclear capabilities, Israel and Iran are engaged in a heated arms race. Both countries are clearly preparing for an era where generals, rather than diplomats, call the shots.

Indicative of this are the threats thundering back and forward between Jerusalem and Tehran. Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad calls for Israel to be wiped of the map, which is logical considering the ayatollahs have never considered the Jewish state to be legitimate. Ahmadinejad's hateful tirades are making even the most peace-inclined leaders ask themselves if maybe his comments should be taken more seriously.

Israel's chief of intelligence warns that the international community only has four more months to bring an end to Iran's nuclear program. After that diplomatic efforts will be useless. The point of no return will have been reached and no one will be able to prevent Ahmadinejad from building himself the ultimate weapon.

The world could then teeter on the edge of apocalypse. Especially if Ahmadinejad suddenly feels called by a higher power to prepare the way for the return of the Mahdi, Islam's prophesized redeemer who supposedly will appear on earth just before judgement day. The hate-spouting president seriously considers himself a mystical visionary filled with "holy light." In order to prepare for the Mahdi, Ahmadinejad wants to use Iran's nuclear program to challenge both the United States and Israel.

Without such nuclear ambitions, his combination of anti-Semitism and messianism would be an internal matter for the Iranian theocracy. But as it stands now, an already dangerous mixture of Iranian hate takes on a highly toxic military dimension. A politician who dreams of the return of the Mahdi simply has no place in his worldview for non-believers.

Iran makes no secret of its nuclear ambitions. However, the country hides its true intentions. Tehran brazenly claims an atomic program would ensure its independence from oil. Only small minority in the west still believe the claim that such technology would only be used for civilian purposes. Why would one of the world's oil-richest nations ever need nuclear reactors?

While the EU and America still try to convince Iran not to develop a nuclear bomb via diplomatic means, the well-focused ayatollahs diligently continue with their plans. By repeatedly pushing new diplomatic initiatives with the aim of curbing their craze for nukes, Germany, Britain and France are letting Iran play them for fools. Iranian diplomats speak of peace in English and call for war in Farsi.

Preparing for war

Since the Iranian bomb is a global menace, the nuclear dispute with the Islamic Republic must be pushed to the top of the international community's agenda this year. But the problem will probably not be solved by diplomacy alone. Russia and China would veto any call for sanction in the UN Security Council. But peaceful means are more likely to fail due to the fact that Ahmadinejad wants nuclear weapons not only for political reasons, but also for ideological ones. The type of diplomacy necessary to hold a rational dialogue with an ideological regime has yet to be invented. And that is why Washington, Jerusalem and Ankara are already considering scenarios for war.

As part of the militaristic pre-game, Tehran has the ability to whip up its allies in Gaza and Beirut including the militias of Hamas and Hezbollah. Both are supplied with money and weapons by Iran. If the ayatollahs can be kept from getting a nuclear bomb, they'll still have the potent weapon of terror on the backburner.

Pierre Heumann is the Middle East correspondent for the weekly Swiss newsmagazine "Weltwoche"

 

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,393757,00.html

진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

팔레스티나(팔레스타인)...

...IS PREPARING

FOR 1.25 ELECTIONS..


 

 

 

RAFAH, Gaza Strip (AP) - Hundreds of Palestinians crossed into Egypt on Wednesday after militants, angry at the jailing of their leader, stole two bulldozers and smashed through the wall separating Gaza and Egypt.

The militants rammed the wall hours after they blocked the official border crossing and took over government buildings.

As many as 300 Palestinians crossed into Egypt after the wall was smashed, an Egyptian security official said. Brig. Adel Fawzi, director of criminal investigation for North Sinai, said border police were unable to stop the intruders because they had no orders to shoot.

Thousands of Egyptian Interior Ministry troops headed to the border. An Egyptian armored vehicle was set on fire and at least three Palestinians were reported injured, one seriously when an Egyptian troop carrier crushed him against a wall, witnesses said.

The militants belong to the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, a violent offshoot of Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah Party. They rammed the massive wall as a show of force against the Palestinian Authority.

The militants' rampage through the southern Gaza town of Rafah underscored the growing lawlessness in Palestinian towns, especially in Gaza. Abbas, who has condemned the chaos, has been unable to impose order, and his failure to keep the gunmen in check is expected to harm Fatah's prospects in Jan. 25 parliamentary elections.

 

Palestinian fighters from the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades/Fatah are seen inside the office

of the central elections commission in the southern Gaza Strip town of

Rafah, Wednesday Jan. 4, 2006. 

 

 

Fatah-affiliated vigilantes demanding government jobs or the release of imprisoned friends have been responsible for much of the anarchy, particularly since Israel's pullout from Gaza in September.

The tightly run Islamic militant group Hamas, whose followers have rarely been involved in vigilante violence, is expected to do well in the vote against the corruption-tainted Fatah. Hamas, which opposes the existence of Israel, has killed hundreds of Israelis in attacks.

The latest rampage began Tuesday, when Palestinian intelligence arrested Al Aqsa militant Alaa al-Hams on suspicion he and his followers kidnapped British human rights activist Kate Burton and her parents for two days last week. The Burtons were among 19 foreigners abducted by Fatah gunmen in Gaza in recent months. All have been freed unharmed.

Al-Hams followers then fired at the Palestinian security headquarters in the southern town of Rafah where he was held. Police and gunmen fired in the air, but there were no injuries.

On Wednesday morning, some 40 masked gunmen took over the central election office in Rafah, the local branch of the Palestinian parliament, a court and another government building. Gunmen were seen on rooftops, inside the buildings and posted at the main doors. Most workers fled.

A truckload of gunmen then drove to the nearby Rafah border crossing with Egypt, Gaza's main gate to the world.

Firing in the air, they closed the entrance gate to the crossing compound and told waiting passengers to leave. They also set up an impromptu checkpoint at the access road to the crossing, turning away travelers.

They left the buildings and the crossing after three hours.

But hours later, with al-Hams still in jail, the militants stole two bulldozers in Rafah and headed for the massive wall, which keeps Palestinians out of the Philadelphi corridor next to a smaller wall that marks the official border with Egypt.

``We are going to do everything we can to pressure the authority to release our leader,'' said an Al Aqsa leader who gave his name as Abu Hassan.

The bulldozers smashed two holes at the same spot where Hamas militants blasted through the towering concrete barrier during the border chaos following Israel's Gaza pullout. Palestinian security officials had closed the earlier hole with heavy concrete blocks, but those quickly gave way before the bulldozer.

Hundreds of Palestinians swarmed into the border corridor.

``Many people walked through. The Palestinian police can't stop them,'' said Fawzi Shaheen, a 26-year-old Rafah resident who ran toward the border.

The Rafah crossing was handed to Palestinian control, under European supervision, as part of a U.S.-brokered deal with Israel last month. Since then, the crossing was forced to shut down several times during attacks by gunmen.

Israel threatened to close the Rafah crossing in coordination with European observers if the breach is not repaired, according to a Defense Ministry complaint sent to the United States and the Palestinians, the ministry said. In the message, Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz expressed grave concern over the development.

Salima Abu Maghaseeb, 42, said she was angry over the disruption of her plans to travel to Egypt with her daughter for her daughter's wedding this week.

``I don't know why the Palestinian Authority is allowing them to do this,'' said Abu Maghaseeb, who had her documents checked at the impromptu roadblock. ``Those people should use their guns ... to protect people and not to come and terrify us. God only knows what the future holds for Gaza.''...

In other chaos, Palestinian gunmen burst into a Rafah house early Wednesday and tried to kidnap the parents of Rachel Corrie, an American who was killed (by I"D"F, no chr.!) in 2003 as she protested the impending demolition of a house in the southern Gaza town, according to a witness.

The five gunmen appeared to be affiliated with the ruling Fatah movement, according to Samir Nasrallah, the Corries' host, but it was not clear if they were from the same group that blockaded the border. The gunmen eventually relented after being told who their targets were, he said.

Corrie, of Olympia, Wash., was crushed to death by an Israeli bulldozer as she tried to stop it from demolishing Nasrallah's house. Her parents, Craig and Cindy, have repeatedly visited Nasrallah since their daughter's death. They left Gaza safely after the attempted kidnapping, Nasrallah said.

...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5522755,00.html 

 

 

If you have not enough, read more here:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1136361011009&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

and here (al-Djazeera):

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/EEFD7413-4992-4758-B360-436F8C4A8048.htm

and the latest news (from Israel, CET 01:26) here:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1136361011009&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

네팔: 민주주의투쟁 #1

1996 - 2006, Ten Years

People's War in Nepal

And Decades of People's Struggle for

Democracy, Political Progress...

 

Following documentary was posted a short time ago by comrades of mine (Mahbub and Raju). So I also will post it here, but including some background informations and (perhaps) useful links.

 

 

Power To The People

Produced by GEFONT

(General Federation of Nepalese Trade Unions)

http://www.gefont.org

 

 

 

According to the Communist Party of Nepal(Unified Marxists/Leninists, UML) the struggle against the monarchy in Nepal started in the late 1940's of the last century.

 

Timeline: Nepal's turbulent history:

 

1951 - End of King Rana rule. Sovereignty of crown restored and anti-Rana rebels in Nepalese Congress Party form government.

1955 - King Tribhuwan dies, King Mahendra ascends throne.

1959 - Multi-party constitution adopted.

1960 - King Mahendra seizes control and suspends parliament, constitution and party politics after Nepali Congress Party (NCP) wins elections with B. P. Koirala as premier.

1962 - New constitution provides for non-party system of councils known as "panchayat" under which king exercises sole power. First elections to Rastrya Panchayat held in 1963.

1972 - King Mahendra dies, succeeded by Birendra.

1980 - Constitutional referendum follows agitation for reform. Small majority favours keeping existing panchayat system. King agrees to allow direct elections to national assembly - but on a non-party basis.

1985 - Communists begin civil disobedience campaign for restoration of multi-party system.

1986 - New elections boycotted by communists.

1989 - Trade and transit dispute with India leads to border blockade by Delhi resulting in worsening economic situation.

1990 - Pro-democracy agitation co-ordinated by communist and leftist groups. Street protests suppressed by security forces resulting in deaths and mass arrests. King Birendra eventually bows to pressure and agrees to new democratic constitution.

1991 - Nepali Congress Party wins first democratic elections. Girija Prasad Koirala becomes prime minister.

1994 - Koirala's government defeated in no-confidence motion. New elections lead to formation of UML Communist government.

1995 - Communist government dissolved. Radical leftist group, the Nepal Communist Party (Maoist) begins insurrection in rural areas aimed at abolishing monarch and establishing people's republic.

1997 - Continuing political instability as Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba is defeated and replaced by Lokendra Bahadur Chand. Chand is then forced to resign because of party splits and is replaced by Surya Bahadur Thapa.

1998 - Thapa stands down because of party splits. GP Koirala returns as prime minister heading a coalition government.

1999 - Fresh elections give majority to Nepali Congress Party. Krishna Prasad Bhattarai becomes prime minister.

2000 - Prime Minister Bhattarai steps down after revolt in Nepali Congress Party. GP Koirala returns as prime minister, heading the ninth government in 10 years.

2001 April - General strike called by Maoist rebels brings life in much of the country to a virtual standstill; police arrest anti-government demonstrators, including some opposition leaders, in Kathmandu.

2001 1 June - King Birendra, Queen Aishwarya and other close relatives killed in shooting spree allegedly by drunken Crown Prince Dipendra, who then shoots himself.

2001 4 June - Prince Gyanendra crowned King of Nepal after the late King Birendra's son, Dipendra - who had been declared king on 2 June - died of injuries sustained during the palace shooting.

2001 July - Maoist rebels step up campaign of violence. Sher Bahadur Deuba becomes prime minister, heading the 11th government in 11 years, after Girija Prasad Koirala quits over the violence.

2001 July - Deuba announces peace with rebels, truce begins.

2001 November - Maoists say peace talks have failed, truce is no longer justified. Launch coordinated attacks on army and police posts.

2001 November - State of emergency declared after more than 100 people are killed in four days of violence. King Gyanendra orders army to crush the Maoist rebels.

2002 April - Maoist rebels order five-day national strike, days after hundreds are killed in two of bloodiest attacks of six-year rebellion.

2002 May - Intense clashes between military and rebels in the west. Rebels declare one-month ceasefire, rejected by government.

Deuba visits Britain and other states, seeking help in the war against Maoist rebels. US President George W Bush pledges $20 million.

2002 May - Parliament dissolved, fresh elections called amid political confrontation over extending the state of emergency. Deuba expelled by his Nepali Congress party, heads interim government, renews emergency.

2002 October - Deuba asks king to put off elections by a year because of Maoist violence. King Gyanendra dismisses Deuba and indefinitely puts off elections set for November. Lokendra Bahadur Chand appointed to head government.

2003 January - Rebels, government declare ceasefire.

2003 May/June - Lokendra Bahadur Chand resigns as prime minister. King appoints his own nominee Surya Bahadur Thapa as new premier.

2003 August - Rebels pull out of peace talks with government and end seven-month truce. Rebels call three-day general strike in September.

late 2003 onwards - Political stalemate; clashes between students/activists and police; resurgence of violence.

2004 May - Royalist Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa resigns following weeks of street protests by opposition groups.

2004 June - King Gyanendra reappoints Sher Bahadur Deuba as prime minister.

2004 August - Maoist rebels stage week-long blockade of Kathmandu, stopping supplies from reaching the city.

2004 December - Maoist rebels stage week-long blockade of capital.

2005 February - King Gyanendra dismisses Prime Minister Deuba and his government, assumes executive power, declares state of emergency.

 

Source: Communist Party of India(ML) http://www.cpiml.org

 

Read also this:

http://www.monthlyreview.org/0605singh.htm

 

Here you can learn about the opinions of the chairman of the CPN(M) about the people's war:

http://www.insof.org/news/180405_interv-parchanda.htm

 

CPN(M):

http://www.cpnm.org

 

CPN(UML)

http://www.cpnuml.org

 

INSIDE NEPAL'S REVOLUTION (National Geographic, Nov. '05)

 

A interesting, commented photo story(slide show) - but more from the western (or should I say bourgeois..? actually not really..) perspective - you can watch here (you must click on the hammer and sickle^^):

http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0511/feature3/multimedia.html

 

 

Latest articles:

 

International Herald Tribune

Rebels refuse to extend Nepal truce
The Associated Press, Reuters, Agence France-Presse
MONDAY, JANUARY 2, 2006
KATMANDU, Nepal Nepal's Maoist rebels said Monday that they would not extend their four-month unilateral cease-fire that was to end at midnight.

 

The rebels' truce started Sept. 3 and was later extended by a month in response to public pressure. The announcement on Monday came after rights groups and political parties here had asked the insurgents to extend the cease-fire.

 

"We have found out that the rebel leaders are holding consultations whether to further extend the cease-fire," Jhanath Khanal, a leader of the Nepal Communist Party-United Marxist Leninist, said early Monday. "We have asked them to prolong the truce by at least another 15 days and give the government another chance."

 

The Royal Nepalese Army had not matched the cease-fire and called it a ploy by the militants to buy time to reorganize.

 

On Monday afternoon, the Maoists said they would not extend the truce because the military continued to press its campaign against them.

 

"The royal army is surrounding our people's liberation army, which is in defensive positions, to carry out ground as well as air attacks on us," the rebels said in a statement. "Therefore, we are compelled to go on the offensive not only for the sake of peace and democracy but for the sake of self-defense."

 

Political groups in the capital had awaited the rebels' decision with some hope of success.

 

The European Union and the United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, had issued statements urging the Maoists to extend the cease-fire in their "people's war."

 

In November a group of seven opposition parties, four of which were removed from power by King Gyanendra in February, reached a 12-point agreement with the Maoists. The agreement was intended to get Gyanendra to step aside and restore multiparty democracy in this impoverished Himalayan country.

 

Under the cease-fire, the rebels pledged not to attack military or civilian targets in hopes of reviving peace talks but said they would continue to defend their positions.

 

They have, however, continued to block highways, extort money and kidnap villagers for indoctrination sessions.

 

Political parties said that the rebels were being provoked by the government's refusal to join the cease-fire and its description of the militants as terrorists. "The government statements and attitude is angering them," said Pradeep Nepal of the Communist Party of Nepal.

 

The rebels have agreed with the country's seven main political parties to step up their opposition to the administration of the king, who dismissed a provisional government and seized absolute power early last year.

 

The rebels, who claim to be inspired by Mao Zedong, have been fighting to topple Nepal's monarchy and establish a communist state. More than 12,000 people have died in the decade-long insurgency.

 

 

 

Trade Unions urge re-continue of cease-fire

to the rebel and ask the regime to reciprocate

January 1, 2006.


Three recognised trade union Confederation GEFONT, NTUC, DECONT and the Teachers' Union of Nepal (TUN) have issued a Joint Press Communiqué on the occasion of New Year 2006. Signed by GEFONT Secretary General Binod Shrestha, NTUC Treasurer Ganesh Niraula, DECONT Women Vice-president Rama Paudel and TUN President Keshav P Bhattarai following is the full text:

 

Nation is under a painful transition from violent conflict to peace and from autocracy to democracy. Entire people including political parties, professional and trade unions, civil society, youth & students are in street struggle. We extend our support and solidarity to the efforts of political parties for Peace and Full-fledged Democracy on behalf of democratic forces in Nepal.

 

Today is the First Day of New Year 2006 and also the last day of cease-fire declared by CPN (Maoist) for 3 months in the beginning and additional one month as the significant outcome of continued efforts of main-stream political parties.

 

During the period, a historical 12-point Understanding for peace and restructuring of Nepali society & governance has been reached between 7- agitating political parties and CPN (Maoist). However, the present autocratic regime has taken it negatively and created obstacle in the peace process. The frequent appeals of international community to abandon the hue and cry of election drama and to take initiative for peace have been ignored by the Royal Regime.

 

On the Eve of New Year 2006, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and European Union have called-on again to continue cease-fire to the Maoist and reciprocate it to the regime. We welcome this call in favour of entire Nepali working people and extend heartfelt thanks to UN and the EU. On this occasion, we would like to take an opportunity to extend the best wishes of the New Year to Nepali people, working mass and the whole globe.

 

People are worried in the fear of the end of relief prevalent during the past four months. At the moment, we demand with both the regime and Maoist not to push the nation and people towards blood-shed and game of death again.

 

Thus, we sincerely appeal the CPN (Maoist) to re-continue the cease-fire and ask the regime to reciprocate cease-fire and initiate for peace by giving-up rhetoric of "election".

 

진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

팔레스티나 <->이스라엘 #3

 

 

The Escalation Will Lead To... NOWHERE!!

 

 

 

The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition

Terrorists threaten to upgrade missiles



Three armed Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip on Monday threatened to continue their attacks on Israel and said they have long-range missiles capable of reaching more Israeli towns and cities.

One of the groups belongs to Fatah, the ruling party headed by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas. The two others are the Popular Resistance Committees, an alliance of various armed groups, and al-Quds Brigades, the armed wing of Islamic Jihad.

PA officials in Ramallah expressed deep concern over the threats and said Israel was responsible for the latest cycle of violence. "Israel must stop its military offensive before the situation gets out of control," a senior PA official told The Jerusalem Post. "Israel's decision to set up a security zone [in the northern Gaza Strip] will only complicate matters." 

Asked about the new long-range missiles, the official said he did not rule out the possibility that such weapons had been smuggled from Egypt in recent weeks.

Representatives of the three armed groups appeared at a joint press conference in Gaza City, where they said attacks on Israel would continue following of Israel's decision to establish a security zone in the northern Gaza Strip to stop rocket attacks.

"The security zone will never bring security to Israel," said one of the gunmen. "As the Zionist enemy is in a state of confusion because of our painful attacks, the war leaders of the Zionist enemy are threatening to wage a merciless war on our people and their freedom fighters."

A leaflet distributed by the three groups said the current truce with Israel "went to hell" because of Israel's policy of targeted killings. "Launching rocket attacks is one of the means of resistance and soon there will be surprises," the leaflet warned.

Earlier, the armed wing of Fatah, Aksa Martyrs Brigades, claimed that it possessed Grad missiles with a range of 25 kilometers.

"If Israel sets up a security zone in the northern Gaza Strip our group will not sit idly by," warned Abu Fadi, a spokesman for the group in the Gaza Strip. "We will use these weapons and the occupation government will be the biggest loser due to its own actions."

"Members of the [Fatah] rocket unit are capable of hitting targets deep in the Zionist entity," he added. "We want to warn the barbaric [Defense Minister Shaul] Mofaz that our men can hit targets in Ashkelon. But we have no plans to use these missiles unless Israel attacks the Gaza Strip or assassinates senior Palestinian commanders."

The 122-mm. caliber Grad missile, officially known as BM-21, was first used by the Soviet Red Army in 1963. The first missiles were fired from trucks fitted with launchers capable of firing 40 rockets within six seconds.

The Popular Resistance Committees also claimed on Monday that its members managed to develop a homemade rocket with a range of 15 km.

Muhammad Abdel al-Al, a spokesman for the group who is better known by his nickname Abu Abeer, said the group's armed wing, Salah al-Din Brigades, developed the rockets that were fired into Israel during the past few months with an accuracy rate of about 80 percent. He claimed that his group had maps of army bases and towns and cities near the Gaza Strip.

The claims of improved rocket technology came as Palestinians fired three Kassam rockets at southern Israel. No injuries or damage were reported.

One rocket landed near a kindergarten in a kibbutz near Gaza during a Hanukka party that was attended by 50 children.

...

Please read the comments (about 50 or so..)!

For example:

"3. Stopping the rockets
Mark Rosenblit - Three Boys Presently Serving in IDF
12/26/2005 18:29

While it's possible to reduce injury to life & property by digging more bomb shelters, thickening building walls, or -- more radically but only creating a temporary respite -- relocating whole towns beyond rocket range, these defensive measures will not stop our adversaries from firing rockets at our civilian population centers. On the contrary, they will radiate weakness & serve as a catalyst for the manufacture of a better class of rockets. As distastful as it might sound to modern ears, the only way to stop rockets raining down upon our civilian population centers (short of expelling the Arabs from Gaza -- which may yet come to pass) is to retaliate with mortar fire against Gaza's civilian population centers. Yes, Israel will be severely condemned by the U.N, the U.S., the E.U. & an alphabet soup of "humanitarian" NGOs -- in fact, despite Israel's famous restraint, that already happens on a daily basis -- but the rockets WILL stop. Shame on the Government for not taking action."

"13. What are Israel's leaders waiting for
Earnest
12/26/2005 20:29

Hey, Israeli leaders, there is a war going on and bombs aimed at your peaceful citizens. What the h... are you waiting for. No country in the world would sit and wait for a split second. What has become of Israel. There is no father or mother there any more."

"28. Why not?
Bruce P. - Sweden
12/26/2005 23:01

Why not terminate a militant leader, wait for the fanatic funeral attended by his followers in the thousands, then drop a bomb right in the middle of it? Preferably a Daisy Cutter..."

 

And so on, and so on...

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=2&cid=1134309652347&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Actually it's very interesting (well, with the most I don't agree, not at all..), because it just shows the reality there...

12.27, I"D"F heavy artillery against Gaza

 

Read also this:

IDF to enforce northern Gaza buffer zone as of 6 p.m. (Jerusalem Post, 12.28)

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1135696348167&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

Israel hits back to halt Palestinian rocket attacks (The Guardian, UK, 12.28)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1674331,00.html



진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

香港: 反WTO 투쟁 #7

THE FINAL (?) BATTLE

 

First of all: it seems that the protest against WTO in HK since last night, at least for the majority of the S. Koreans, is over. Nearly all were arrested...

 

One major thing is very impressive and important: especially the activities of the S. Korean protestors got a lot of sympathy of the HK citizens. Many of them agreed with the demonstrators opinion that WTO is nothing in their interest, it's just in the interest of the capitalist class...

 

 

Global trade riots rock Hong Kong

Police fight running battles with protesters and break up demos with tear gas as WTO negotiations reach climax

The Observer

Hong Kong was hit by its most violent street clashes in more than 30 years last night as riot police fought running battles with protesters on the penultimate day of World Trade Organisation talks.

While negotiators inside the conference hall struggled to agree to a watered-down compromise on the future of global commerce, demonstrators outside ratcheted up their attempt to derail a deal that they believe sells poor countries short.

The result was the fiercest fighting this normally sedate commercial city has seen since the 1960s.

...

Despite the conservative and peace-loving reputation of Hong Kong, many local people who saw the clashes sympathised with the demonstrators.

Dozens joined the protests, some wearing surgical face masks for the first time since the Sars crisis, but this time to conceal their identity and protect themselves against tear gas...

 

Read more here: 

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1669943,00.html

 

CNN reported this:

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/12/18/wto.protests/index.html

And here is the TV version:

http://edition.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/world/2005/12/17/chinoy.hk.protests.south.koreans.cnn

 

 

Here you can read the report by Minjung-ui Sori (Voice of the People, in Korean). There are also five video docus. The last one is about the mass arrests. What I don’t understand: At home the S. Korean protestors are fighting against the government, but in HK they are shouting "Dae~han Mingug (Republic of Korea)!" PERHAPS "JUST" A FORM OF NATIONALISM??!!

http://www.voiceofpeople.org/new/2005121734325.html

 

The video ducumentaries:

 

On docu #2 you can see Chinese activists, joining the protest..

On docu #3 you can see, beside all the battle, the positive reactions of HK citizens..

 

 

 

Here you find the special Anti-WTO section by Chamsesang (in Korean):

http://www.newscham.net/apec/index.php?section=apec_rpt

Here you can read the latest news by intl. independent media

http://www.targetwto.revolt.org/

 

 

Here you can read the Urgent appeal by Hong Kong People's Alliance on the WTO:

http://daga.dhs.org/hkpa/index.html


 

Another thing, I don’t understand: following picture the German magazine Der Spiegel published today in connection with last night’s riots in HK. It’s just a mistake? Or S. Korean riot cops really were on the spot?

 

 

 

 

Last but least: A final draft of a World Trade Organization agreement has proposed Sunday that all nations end agricultural export subsidies by 2013 in a breakthrough that paves the way for an agreement from the six-day talks, AP reports. That’s all what they achieved... "Finally everything what was achieved is in the interest of the rich countries...", ActionAid said.


진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

香港: 反WTO 투쟁 #6

POLICE TERROR vs TOURIST ATTRACTION

 

The semi-official news agency Yonhap yesterday (12.17), surprisingly, wrote that:

HONG KONG, Dec. 17 (Yonhap) -- A group of South Koreans, mostly farmers, in town to protest a meeting on free trade, are becoming something of an tourist attraction rather than something to be feared and avoided among the locals... (of course they mean 삼보일배... ). Read more here:

http://english.yna.co.kr/Engnews/20051217/610000000020051217142830E9.html

 

But just some hours later our comrades found back to the "approved" style of protest: "Hundreds of , mainly South Korean, protesters wielding bamboo sticks broke through police lines Saturday and tried to storm the convention center hosting global trade talks... 41 people were injured and 900 were detained...", AP reported yesterday evening.

 

 

More you can read here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5486354,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5486434,00.html

http://edition.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/world/2005/12/17/chinoy.hk.protests.cnn (a video by f... CNN)



 







 

uhuu~ "poor" HK police.. (Sing Pao daily, HK. 12.17)

即時新聞速遞 即時新聞速遞
示威行動升級警放催淚彈
世貿示威者在突破警方防線後節節向會展進發,衝突也升級,警方最後要施放催淚彈,才能扭轉局勢。 [詳情]
明報頭條新聞
灣仔淪陷
【明報專訊】香港昨日經歷了1967年暴動以來最嚴重的騷動,連 ... 詳情
頭條新聞圖片
Ming Pao (daily, HK, 12.17), "The worst fights since 1967.."

진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

香港: 反WTO 투쟁 #5

S. Korean Street Fighters - 'Heroes'

For The HK Press..^^

 



Source: ChamSaesang, more you can read here in Korean:

http://www.newscham.net/news/view.php?board=news&id=34760

 

 

Yesterday's Ming Pao:

http://www.mingpaonews.com/20051214/main.htm

 

...and so on, and so on...^^

진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

香港: 反WTO 투쟁 #4

HK, 13.11: THE 2nd DAY OF RESISTANCE

AGAINST THE WTO SUMMIT

 

 

 

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/gall/0,8542,1666419,00.html

Pics in the mainstream media (Guardian, UK)

 

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/GL13Ad01.html

Asia Times (HK)

 

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GL14Dj02.html

Asia Times (HK)

 

 

Independent media:

 

http://www.newscham.net/news/view.php?board=news&id=34755

Chamsaesang, Korean, pics

 

http://www.newscham.net/news/view.php?board=coolmedia&id=1250

Chamsaesang, Korean, video about the first clash with the cops...

 

Splashing Against Imperialism...

The Movement On Foreign Mission! (Just making friends...)

 

 

http://targetwto.revolt.org/

Target: WTO, English

 

http://daga.dhs.org/hkpa/paw/pawindex.html

(Hong Kong) People’s Alliance on WTO, 民間監察世貿聯盟

 

http://www.voiceofpeople.org/new/hongkong/

Minjung-ui Sori, Voice of the People, Korean.

Wow... with the most strange (...) music on air...

...you can hear all the "smash hits" of the movement!!!

 

 

 

 

FIGHT THE POWER!!





진보블로그 공감 버튼트위터로 리트윗하기페이스북에 공유하기딜리셔스에 북마크

  • 제목
    CINA
  • 이미지
    블로그 이미지
  • 설명
    자본주의 박살내자!
  • 소유자
    no chr.!

저자 목록

달력

«   2024/03   »
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

기간별 글 묶음

찾아보기

태그 구름

방문객 통계

  • 전체
    1882973
  • 오늘
    211
  • 어제
    288